How does corroborating evidence function in solicitation prosecutions? Why is corroborating evidence important? Is corroborating evidence necessary?

Which of the intent levels is the most difficult to prove?

A local builder offers to place with you insurance on every house he/she builds while it is under construction. In return, he/she wants you to allow him/her 20 % discount off the premium required by insurers. How would you respond to comply with RIBO Regulations? OA) You can only allow a five percent (5%) discount because of your overhead and expenses. OB) You will pay the builder a flat $10.00 fee for each house, but it is contrary to RIBO Regulations to discount the premium. OC) You refuse to pay the builder anything, since it would contravene RIBO Regulations. OD) You offer the builder a 20% premium refund for those houses that have no claims while under construction.

i need the answer quickly

On March 3rd 2009, the Fraud Examination Team, a department of the Bureau of Fraud Examination, received a call from Anton Valukas, chairman of the Chicago law firm Jenner & Block LLP. In early 2009, a bankruptcy court in New York assigned Valukas to investigate and report on the causes of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LBHI)[1]’s 2008 bankruptcy. During this investigation, Valukas came across “Repo 105” and “Repo 108” transactions that Lehman used from 2001 to 2008. A “repo” or repurchase agreement is a form of short-term borrowing, whereby one party agrees to temporarily “sell” securities to another party at a specified price, while also committing to repurchase them at a future date, and at a usually higher preset price by the same buyer. While “repo” transactions are legal and are frequently used by investment banks as a means of obtaining short-term financing, Valukas stated that given the period of the fiscal year when these transactions were mostly conducted, as well as how…

The difference between fraud and errors is: a. the timing of the transaction b. the materiality of the value involved. c. intent of those involved. d.  whether it affects owners’ equity or not.

Five Factors that can affect claims handling competency are; Changes in the claims environment, changes in job responsibilities, attrition of knowledge over time, limited insurer resources, and communication with represented claimants. True False

Discuss why it is said that U.S federal statutes protect citizens from government surveillance but at the same time authorize the government to collect data.

How did the court evaluate the Prewitt v Numismatic Funding Corporation case?

Please do not give solution in image formate thanku.