How can we stop a central processing unit from squandering processing cycles by carrying out the processing of a large number of instructions simultaneously? To what degree does the successful execution of this plan rely on particular components being present or absent? Give an example of one of the consequences that result from their actions.

How can we stop a central processing unit from squandering processing cycles by carrying out the processing of a large number of instructions simultaneously? To what degree does the successful execution of this plan rely on particular components being present or absent? Give an example of one of the consequences that result from their actions.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

A processor that can decode encrypted data as well as system instructions and then execute the instructions on the decoded data and system instructions has been proposed in many ways. The submitted resuits will then be encrypted by the processor. What precisely are the benefits of employing such a CPU? What architectural requirements are there for a CPU with this level of performance and efficiency?
What do you believe to be the single most significant factor to take into account while transitioning from a batch processing system to a serial one?Your response need to be supported by some kind of argument or explanation.
When dealing with a large computer, it is helpful to divide processes and programmes into smaller subsystems. What are the advantages of segmenting this system into logical components?
It would be preferable to store structures in each process's local memory and access them through interprocess communication rather than shared memory. What's wrong with this design?
To you, switching from a serial to a batch processing paradigm is the most pressing need. Consider the merits of your opinion and provide a sound justification for it.
Synthetic benchmarks are created by combining basic computer functions in proportions that developers feel will yield an indicative measure of the performance capabilities of the machine under test. These benchmarks try to match the average frequency of operations and operands of a large set of programs. These tests are designed to have easily repeatable results for accurate comparisons and minimal bottlenecks across different isolated tests. This makes it easier to test individual parts—like an SSD or Processor—without other factors affecting results, but it also may not reflect a user's actual experience with the machine since it doesn't test everything working together.1. Differentiate the following synthetic benchmarks:a. Whetstoneb. Dhrystonec. Linpack
In contrast, for implementation, a processor capable of decoding encrypted data and system instructions and then executing the instructions on the decoded data and system instructions has been suggested. The CPU will encrypt the filed suits. What are the benefits of using a processor of this caliber? What are the specifications for this sort of processor?
Do huge computer processes and programmes benefit from being broken into smaller subsystems? Is there a benefit to logically segmenting this system?
Alternate architectures include keeping shared structures in the local memory of a particular process, and accessing them through interprocess communication. Was the downside of such a design?
The challenge of multitasking on a single system is challenging. Why not use a real-world scenario and a real-time machine to illustrate the issue?
How can we avoid a central processing unit from wasting processing cycles by processing a high number of instructions at the same time? To what degree does the existence or absence of particular components affect the implementation of this plan? Give an example of one of the consequences they cause.
When enormous computer processes and programmes are disassembled into their component pieces, do the meanings of the subsystems of these processes and programmes still remain? How does the system profit from being fragmented in such a manner, and in what ways does it not?