Given four propositions A, B, C, and D, how many models are there for the sentence   “(C or D) and not A”?

Draw Semantic Network for the scenario of “The Horse and Camel are mammal, where all of them are animals can run and have eyes and the horse is brown and can jump and the camel can’t jump”.

For each logical argument, select the truth values for the propositional variables that show the logical argument is invalid. 1) 2) q P→→q ..p/q (¬s Vr) V¬s ..rs p= = Pick r = Pick q= Pick S = Pick

Select ALL the sentences of FOL. G(P) AxLikes(x,pia) G(p)  Pia   AxLikes(x,y)   AxGuilty(x)  Guilty(x)

The principles of PDDL are being applied to an imaginary setting that goes by the moniker JUNGLE. There are three predicates in this universe, and each one may take a maximum of four arguments. There are also five constants. It is important to restrict the amount of states that may exist on the JUNGLE planet. It is necessary to provide justification.

1: Prove the validity of the following sequents : a. (cAn) → t, hA-s, hA-(s V c) pE (n A¬t) → p b. (s – p) V (t → q) E (s → q) V (t → p) C. vx (P(x) → (Q(x) V R(x))), – 3x (P(x) A R(x)) Fvx (P(x) → Q(x))

It's not quite apparent what BQP is or how it relates to NP.

Does the fact ¬Spouse(George,Laura) follow from the facts Jim≠George and Spouse(Jim,Laura)? If so, give a proof; if not, supply additional axioms as needed. What happens if we use Spouse as a unary function symbol instead of a binary predicate?

It's not quite apparent what BQP is or how it relates to NP.

The PDDL describes a fictional jungle. This universe has three predicates with up to four parameters and five constants. JUNGLE should have fewer states. Must justify.