For many years, Manama Corporation has used a straightforward absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing, with a markup percentage of 20%. It has recently lost considerable business to foreign competitors that have become very aggressive in the marketplace. These firms appear to be using target costing. An example of Manama Corporation's product no. 700, which has the following unit-cost characteristics: direct materials, $50, direct labor, $90, manufacturing overhead, $40, and selling and administrative expenses, $20. The going market price for an identical product of identical quality is $210, which is below what Manama Corporation is charging Required: a) What is Manama Corporation's selling price for product no. 700 under its current absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing? b) If Manama Corporation used target costing for item no. 700, what should have been its target cost per unit if the company desired to meet market price of $210 and maintain its current rate of profit on sales?

For many years, Manama Corporation has used a straightforward absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing, with a markup percentage of 20%. It has recently lost considerable business to foreign competitors that have become very aggressive in the marketplace. These firms appear to be using target costing. An example of Manama Corporation's product no. 700, which has the following unit-cost characteristics: direct materials, $50, direct labor, $90, manufacturing overhead, $40, and selling and administrative expenses, $20. The going market price for an identical product of identical quality is $210, which is below what Manama Corporation is charging Required: a) What is Manama Corporation's selling price for product no. 700 under its current absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing? b) If Manama Corporation used target costing for item no. 700, what should have been its target cost per unit if the company desired to meet market price of $210 and maintain its current rate of profit on sales?

Name: For many years, Manama Corporation has used a straightforward absorpt
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:32:49.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: For many years, Manama Corporation has used a straightforward absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing, with a markup percentage of 20%. It has recentlylost considerable business to foreign competitors that have become very aggressive in the

Principles of Accounting Volume 2

19th Edition

ISBN:9781947172609

Author:OpenStax

Publisher:OpenStax

Chapter2: Building Blocks Of Managerial Accounting

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5EA: Rose Company has a relevant range of production between 10,000 and 25.000 units. The following cost...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Rose Company has a relevant range of production between 10,000 and 25.000 units. The following cost data represents average cost per unit for 15,000 units of production. Using the cost data from Rose Company, answer the following questions: If 10,000 units are produced, what is the variable cost per unit? If 18,000 units are produced, what is the variable cost per unit? If 21,000 units are produced, what are the total variable costs? If 11,000 units are produced, what are the total variable costs? If 19,000 units are produced, what are the total manufacturing overhead costs incurred? If 23,000 units are produced, what are the total manufacturing overhead costs incurred? If 19,000 units are produced, what are the per unit manufacturing overhead costs incurred? If 25,000 units are produced, what are the per unit manufacturing overhead costs incurred?
For many years, Manama Corporation has used a straightforward absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing, with a markup percentage of 20%. It has recently lost considerable business to foreign competitors that have become very aggressive in the marketplace. These firms appear to be using target costing. An example of Manama Corporation's product no. 700, which has the following unit-cost characteristics: direct materials, $50, direct labor, $90, manufacturing overhead, $40, and selling and administrative expenses, $20. The going market price for an identical product of identical quality is $210, which is below what Manama Corporation is charging. a) What is Manama Corporation's selling price for product no. 700 under its current absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing? b) If Manama Corporation used target costing for item no. 700, what should have been its target cost per unit if the company desired to meet market price of $210 and maintain its current rate of profit…
Martin Company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing. It is considering the introduction of a new product. To determine a selling price, the company has gathered the following information: Number of units to be produced and sold each year 9,500 Unit product cost $ 36 Estimated annual selling and administrative expenses $ 41,100 Estimated investment required by the company $ 370,000 Desired return on investment (ROI) 12 % Required: 1. Compute the markup percentage on absorption cost required to achieve the desired ROI. 2. Compute the selling price per unit.
In comparing the traditional system with the activity-based costing system, which of Ergaster’s models had higher unit product costs under the traditional system? Based on this problem:Ergaster Corporation manufactures a variety of products. In the past, Ergaster has been using a traditional costing system in which the predetermined overhead rate was 150% of direct labor cost. Selling prices had been set by multiplying total product cost by 200%. Sensing that this system was distorting costs and selling prices, Ergaster has decided to switch to an activity based costing system for manufacturing overhead costs using three activity cost pools. Selling prices are still to be set at 200% of unit product cost under the new system. Information on these cost pools for next year is as follows: (see image) 11. Under the activity-based costing system, what would be the selling price of one unit of Model #36?
Valmont Company has developed a new industrial piece of equipment called the XP-200. The company is considering two methods of establishing a selling price for the XP-200-absorption cost-plus pricing and value -based pricing. Valmont's cost accounting system reports an absorption unit product cost for XP-200 of $ 9,400. Its markup percentage on absorption cost is 85%. The company's marketing managers have expressed concerns about the use of absorption cost- plus pricing because it seems to overlook the fact that the XP-200 offers superior performance relative to the comparable piece of equipment sold by Valmont's primary competitor. More specifically, the XP-200 can be used for 19,000 hours before replacement. It only requires $2,000 of preventive maintenance during its useful life and it consumes $170 of electricity per 950 hours used. These figures compare favorably to the competing piece of equipment that sells for $19,000, needs to be replaced after 9, 500 hours of use, requires…
Valmont Company has developed a new industrial piece of equipment called the XP-200. The company is considering two methods of establishing a selling price for the XP-200-absorption cost-plus pricing and value-based pricing. Valmont's cost accounting system reports an absorption unit product cost for XP-200 of $9,300. Its markup percentage on absorption cost is 85%. The company's marketing managers have expressed concerns about the use of absorption cost-plus pricing because it seems to overlook the fact that the XP-200 offers superior performance relative to the comparable piece of equipment sold by Valmont's primary competitor. More specifically, the XP-200 can be used for 18,000 hours before replacement. It only requires $1,900 of preventive maintenance during its useful life and it consumes $165 of electricity per 900 hours used. These figures compare favorably to the competing piece of equipment that sells for $18,000, needs to be replaced after 9,000 hours of use, requires $3,800…
For many years , Manama Corporation has used a straightforward absorption costing approach to cost - plus pricing , with a markup percentage of 20 % . It has recently lost considerable business to foreign competitors that have become very copressive in the marketplace . These firms appear to be using target costing An example of Manama Corporation's product no . 700 , which has the following unit - cost characteristics direct materials , $ 50 , direct labor , 590 , manufacturing overhead , $ 40 , and selling and administrative experses $ 20 The going market price for an identical product of identical quality is $ 210 , which is below what Manama Corporation is charging Required a ) What is Manama Corporation's selling price for product no . 700 under its current absorption costing approach to cost plus pricing ? b ) if Manama Corporation used target costing for item no . 700 , what should have been its target cost per unit if the company desired to meet market price of $ 210 and…
Valmont Company developed a new industrial piece of equipment called the XP-200. The company is considering two methods of establishing a selling price for the XP-200-absorption cost-plus pricing and value-based pricing. Valmont's cost accounting system reports an absorption unit product cost for XP-200 of $8,800. Its markup percentage on absorption cost is 85%. The company's marketing managers have expressed concerns about the use of absorption cost-plus pricing because it seems to overlook the fact that the XP-200 offers superior performance relative to the comparable piece of equipment sold by Valmont's primary competitor. More specifically, the XP-200 can be used for 13,000 hours before replacement. It only requires $1,400 of preventive maintenance during its useful life and it consumes $140 of electricity per 650 hours used. These figures compare favorably to the competing piece of equipment that sells for $13,000, needs to be replaced after 6,500 hours of use, requires $2,800 of…
Jamison Company uses the total cost method of applying the cost-plus approach to product pricing. Jamison produces and sells Product X at a total cost of $800 per unit, of which $540 is product cost and $260 is selling and administrative expenses. In addition, the total cost of $800 is made up of $460 variable cost and $340 fixed cost. The desired profit is $88 per unit. Determine the markup percentage on total cost. %
Use this information for Mallard Corporation to answer the question that follow.Mallard Corporation uses the product cost concept of product pricing. Below is the cost information for the production and sale of 45,000 units of its sole product. Mallard desires a profit equal to a 12% rate of return on invested assets of $800,000. Fixed factory overhead cost $82,000 Fixed selling and administrative costs 45,000 Variable direct materials cost per unit 5.50 Variable direct labor cost per unit 7.65 Variable factory overhead cost per unit 2.25 Variable selling and administrative cost per unit 0.90 The cost per unit for the production of the company's product is
Valmont Company developed a new industrial piece of equipment called the XP-200. The company is considering two methods of establishing a selling price for the XP-200-absorption cost-plus pricing and value-based pricing. Valmont's cost accounting system reports an absorption unit product cost for XP-200 of $9,300. Its markup percentage on absorption cost is 85%. The company's marketing managers have expressed concerns about the use of absorption cost-plus pricing because it seems to overlook the fact that the XP-200 offers superior performance relative to the comparable piece of equipment sold by Valmont's primary competitor. More specifically, the XP-200 can be used for 18,000 hours before replacement. It only requires $1,900 of preventive maintenance during its useful life and it consumes $165 of electricity per 900 hours used. These figures compare favorably to the competing piece of equipment that sells for $18,000, needs to be replaced after 9,000 hours of use, requires $3,800 of…
Assume that a company uses the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing. It is considering the introduction of a new product that it hopes to produce and sell at a volume of 10,000 units per year. To determine a selling price, the company has gathered the following information: Direct materials per unit $ 11 Direct labor unit $ 10 Variable manufacturing overhead per unit $ 2 Variable selling expense $ 4 Total fixed manufacturing overhead $ 90,000 Fixed selling and administrative expense $ 40,000 Markup percentage on absorption cost 35% Using the absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing, what selling price would the company establish for this product? Multiple Choice $38.60 $54.00 $48.60 $43.20