Focusing enables to get a competitive edge, but it in like manner passes on a couple of perils that will be troublesome to the focused in firm, for instance, A-the likelihood that competitors will not find incredible ways to deal with facilitate with the drew in association's abilities in serving the market forte. B-the potential for the tendencies and necessities of forte people to move as time goes on toward standard provider thing credits. C-the potential for the forte to end up being unnecessarily charming to such an extent that it will not attract new competitors, in this way giving preposterous market segment benefits. D-the likelihood that a drew in association will end up being exorbitantly cost useful to such an extent that it will achieve absurd advantages. E-None of these are chances worth worrying about. 3:42 AM

ANS ME ! 1    In a completely serious market, the interaction of section or leave closes when    a. Firms are working with abundance limit.    b. Firms are making zero monetary benefit.    c. Firms experience diminishing minimal income.    d. Cost is equivalent to minor expense.    2.    Harmony amounts in business sectors described by oligopoly is    a. Lower than in imposing business model business sectors and higher than in completely serious    markets.    b. Lower than in imposing business model business sectors and lower than in completely serious    markets.    c. Higher than in imposing business model business sectors and higher than in completely serious    markets.

QUESTION 3 Which of the following are feasible strategies for defending against a disruptive technology? O Acquire the entrant with the disruptive technology. Enhance sustaining innovation of the incumbent technology to maintain a competitive edge. Set up innovation that competes directly with the disruptive technology. All of these are feasible strategies.

Consider Jimmy Choo designer shoes. In whatway does Jimmy Choo face many competitors? Inwhat way does Jimmy Choo face no competitors?