
Calculus: Early Transcendentals
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781285741550
Author: James Stewart
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Why is the first step of the proof is incorrect?

Transcribed Image Text:Find the first step in the following "Proof" that is incorrect, and explain in a short paragraph why the reasoning is
incorrect.
Statement: The equation
204 – 50 + 30 = 0ª + 0² – 30 + cos(0)
(8)
has a positive solution. In other words, there is some positive number 0 satisfying (8).
Proof: By dividing both sides of the Equation (8) by
o4 + o² – 30 + cos(0)
it follows Equation (8) has a solution if
204 – 502 + 30
= 1
(9)
04
- 30 + cos(0)
does. Let
204 – 502 + 30
F(0) =
(10)
04 + 02 – 30 + cos(0) *
From (2.5.4) of the text it follows that cos is a continuous function. By Theorem 2.4.2 (i), (ii) and (iii) it follows that
204 – 50 + 30 and 04 + 502 + 30 + cos(0) are both continuous functions. By applying Theorem-2.4.2 (v) it
follows that F is also a continuous function of 0. Then Equation (8) will have a positive solution provided that
F(0) = 1 does.
This will be established by using Theorem 2.6.1. Begin by noting that if 0 = 1 then 204 – 502 + 30 =0 and hence
F(1) = 0. While it is a natural idea that that evaluating 204 – 502 + 30 at 0 = 1 will be useful, finding a value of 0
such that 204 – 502 + 30 > 1 is not that obvious. In such situations it can be useful to evaluate the limit at 0 goes
to oo. With this in mind, observe that
204
502 + 30
lim
000 04
+ 02
30 + cos(0)
204/04 – 50/04 + 30/04
lim
O 100 04/04 + 02/04 – 30/04 + cos(0)/04
2 – 50-2 + 30/0–3
lim
O700 1+0-2 – 30-3 + cos(0)/04
+ 30/0-3
lim, 00 1+0-2 – 30-3 + cos(0)/04
-2
limo +00 2 – 50
= 2.
Let e = 1/2. Then there is some K such that |F(0) – 2| < e= 1/2 for all 0 > K. Let O be greater than both K
and 1. Then |F(O) – 2| < 1/2 and so F(O) > 3/2 > 1. To summarize, the following facts about F have been
shown:
F is continuous at all 0 > 0
F(1) = 0 < 1
there is some O > 1 such that F(O) > 1.
It then follows from Theorem 2.6.1 that there must be some 0 between 1 and O such that F(0) = 1.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps with 1 images

Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Maaarrow_forward8 people are accused of robbery. Exactly 3 of the are guilty, the others are innocent. They confessed the following: A: "G is innocent" E: "B is innocent" H: "F is innocent" C: "H is innocent" F: "D is innocent" D: "A is innocent" G: "E is innocent" Innocent people always tell the truth. Who committed the roberry? Mathematicians never accept solutions without proofs. Write up ac onvincing explanation for your solution.You must justify why these are the only three people who could have committed the crime. This includes a reason for why no one else may have been one of the three.arrow_forwardWhat symbol always goes in the Ho statement of the hypothesis step 1? What three symbols can you put in the Ha statement of the hypothesis step 1? And list one phrase for EACH symbol you can put in the Ha that you've seen in the examplesarrow_forward
- The following is a list of converse statement of modular arithmetic. Determine if any of the following results hold true. ACTIVITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS FOR WEEK 2 3 (0) If a x k = b x k mod n for any integer k, then (r) If a = b' mod n for any positive integer l, then a = b mod n. (p) If a² = b² mod n, then a = b mod n. (g) If a³ = b³ mod n, then a = b mod n. a = b mod n. (s) If 2ª = 2º mod n, then a = b mod n. (t) If 3ª = 3º mod n, then a = b mod n. 3 Again, remember that the above list from (a) to (t) are not all true. Some of them are false. Pick your favorite fact and do the followings:arrow_forward(9) How many different two-digit numbers can be made from the digits 3, 5 and 7 if: (a) the digits can be repeated? (b) the digits cannot be repeated? List all possibilities in each case.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Calculus: Early TranscendentalsCalculusISBN:9781285741550Author:James StewartPublisher:Cengage LearningThomas' Calculus (14th Edition)CalculusISBN:9780134438986Author:Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. WeirPublisher:PEARSONCalculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)CalculusISBN:9780134763644Author:William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric SchulzPublisher:PEARSON
- Calculus: Early TranscendentalsCalculusISBN:9781319050740Author:Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert FranzosaPublisher:W. H. FreemanCalculus: Early Transcendental FunctionsCalculusISBN:9781337552516Author:Ron Larson, Bruce H. EdwardsPublisher:Cengage Learning

Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:9781285741550
Author:James Stewart
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Thomas' Calculus (14th Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:9780134438986
Author:Joel R. Hass, Christopher E. Heil, Maurice D. Weir
Publisher:PEARSON

Calculus: Early Transcendentals (3rd Edition)
Calculus
ISBN:9780134763644
Author:William L. Briggs, Lyle Cochran, Bernard Gillett, Eric Schulz
Publisher:PEARSON

Calculus: Early Transcendentals
Calculus
ISBN:9781319050740
Author:Jon Rogawski, Colin Adams, Robert Franzosa
Publisher:W. H. Freeman


Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions
Calculus
ISBN:9781337552516
Author:Ron Larson, Bruce H. Edwards
Publisher:Cengage Learning