Read the following case and answer the questions given below:
Students in Mrs. Rickshaw’s Student Success class are required to do a half hour team presentation on a topic of their choice.
Mrs. Rickshaw randomly assigns students to teams. Students have approximately four weeks to research and prepare,
including two hours of class time. Marks are given based on an instructor evaluation of the presentation combined with a
peer evaluation by their team members.
Jane, Robert, Danny, Sharon and Liz were assigned to Team 3. During their first team meeting they introduced themselves and began to decide on a topic. After 45 minutes, they were still trying to settle on a topic. They finally settled on Money Management, however the instructor informed them that another team had already chosen that topic but Conflict Management was still available. During the last 15 minutes of class time, Robert tried to convince the group that they should present a role-play of conflict. Sharon wanted to do research and give a more detailed, informational presentation. Jane was excited by the role-play idea and suggested they make a video presentation of their own play-acting. Danny fell asleep some time before the topic was chosen and Liz sat quietly listening to the arguments of her teammates. At the end of the class no work division had occurred but the team agreed to meet in a study area at 4:15 on the following Monday.
After waiting for Danny until 4:30, the team decided to start without him. Jane announced she had to leave in twenty minutes because she had to pick up her child at the day care by 5:00. Robert was ready to start script writing but Sharon wanted to discuss the content of their presentation and assign research – thinking they could write the script once they were knowledgeable. Liz just listened quietly. An argument ensued, and Jane had to leave before a decision was reached. The next meeting was to be held during their class time the next week.
Before the next meeting, Robert convinced Jane that a role-play was the way to go, and together they put together a draft script, working hard to make the skit funny and entertaining. Robert confronted Danny and warned him to attend the class meeting or he wouldn’t get a part in the play. In the meantime, Sharon picked up six books from the library and printed four articles from the Internet. She prepared an outline detailing various aspects of conflict management. Liz just worried about her role in the whole project.
At the class meeting, all team members were present. Robert informed the group that he and Jane had decided to do a skit, and they had a script all ready. Then he began to assign parts to his teammates. Sharon was incensed and insisted the script was short on content and demanded that they re-build the script around her outline. Robert said he wanted no part in a boring presentation.
Danny did not show up to the remaining team meetings. Liz agreed to do a small part in the play. Jane promised to gather props and costumes. Sharon stubbornly insisted on preparing an informational presentation. She would
have liked to have this integrated into the role-play but Robert would not agree to change his script. They planned a practice of the role-play during their math class on the morning of October 16, the day of their presentation.
On the morning of October 16, Danny did not come to school and Liz forgot to bring the props. The practice ended up being more of an argument session. Danny showed up just before Student Success was to start and said “You mean it’s today?!” Liz was very nervous and felt very sick. She wasn’t sure she could do her part. The presentation began with Sharon reading her lengthy introduction and then the skit began. The skit was five minutes in length. The whole presentation left the other class members confused and it ran twelve minutes instead of the required thirty.
Questions:
- Explain the key problems in the case while building team for doing the assigned work.
- Discuss the strengths and weaknesses displayed by each character in the case. Make a list of at least three
suggestions that could have improved that character’s input to the team project.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
- For the three-part question that follows, provide your answer to each question in the given workspace. Identify each part with a coordinating response. Be sure to clearly label each part of your response as Part A, Part B, and Part C.Part A: What is the term for a generalization made about a population using the data from a sample?Part B: Name one challenge that may occur when using a sample to draw a conclusion about a population.Part C: A researcher collects data about the annual salary of employees who work in the information technology field. It would be difficult to survey all employees, so a sample of the population is surveyed. The data is recorded below. Use the table to write one conclusion that can be drawn. Explain why this conclusion is valid. Salary Range (Per Year) Number of Employees $50,000-$59,999 147 $60,000-$69,999 159 $70,000-$79,999 225 $80,000-$89,999 27arrow_forwardThe director of library services at a college did a survey of types of books (by subject) in the circulation library. Then she used library records to take a random sample of 888 books checked out last term and classified the books in the sample by subject. The results are shown below. Subject Area Percent of Books on Subject in CirculationLibrary on This Subject Number of Books inSample on This Subject Business 32% 247 Humanities 25% 209 Natural Science 20% 222 Social Science 15% 127 All other subjects 8% 83 Using a 5% level of significance, test the claim that the subject distribution of books in the library fits the distribution of books checked out by students. (a) What is the level of significance?State the null and alternate hypotheses. H0: The distributions are the same.H1: The distributions are different.H0: The distributions are different.H1: The distributions are different. H0: The distributions are the same.H1: The distributions are the same.H0: The…arrow_forwardTwenty-nine college students, identified as having a positive attitude about Mitt Romney as compared to Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election, were asked to rate how trustworthy the face of Mitt Romney appeared, as represented in their mental image of Mitt Romney’s face. Ratings were on a scale of 0 to 7, with 0 being “not at all trustworthy” and 7 being “extremely trustworthy.” Here are the 29 ratings: 2.6 3.2 3.7 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.9 5.7 4.2 3.9 3.2 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.6 4.6 3.9 3.9 5.3 2.8 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.7 a 95% confidence interval for the mean rating. Is there significant evidence at the 5% level that the mean rating is greater than 3.5 (a neutral rating)?arrow_forward
- Wegman’s (a food market chain) has developed a new store-brand brownie mix. Before they start selling the mix they want to compare how well people like their brownies to brownies made from a popular national brand mix. In order to see if there was any difference in consumer opinion, Wegman’s asked 124 shoppers to participate in a taste test. Each was given a brownie to try. Subjects were not told which kind of brownie they got—that was determined randomly. 58% of the 62 shoppers who tasted a Wegman’s brownie said liked it well enough to buy the mix, compared to 66% of the others who said they would be willing to buy the national brand. Does this result indicate that consumer interest in the Wegman’s mix is lower than for the national brand?arrow_forwardThe director of library services at a college did a survey of types of books (by subject) in the circulation library. Then she used library records to take a random sample of 888 books checked out last term and classified the books in the sample by subject. The results are shown below. Subject Area Percent of Books on Subject in CirculationLibrary on This Subject Number of Books inSample on This Subject Business 32% 284 Humanities 25% 218 Natural Science 20% 207 Social Science 15% 102 All other subjects 8% 77 (b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. (Round the expected frequencies to three decimal places. Round the test statistic to three decimal places.)arrow_forwardYou may need to use the appropriate technology to answer this question. Scores in the first and fourth (final) rounds for a sample of 20 golfers who competed in PGA tournaments are shown in the following table. Player FirstRound FinalRound Michael Letzig 70 72 Scott Verplank 71 72 D. A. Points 70 75 Jerry Kelly 72 71 Soren Hansen 70 69 D. J. Trahan 67 67 Bubba Watson 71 67 Reteif Goosen 68 75 Jeff Klauk 67 73 Kenny Perry 70 69 Player FirstRound FinalRound Aron Price 72 72 Charles Howell 72 70 Jason Dufner 70 73 Mike Weir 70 77 Carl Pettersson 68 70 Bo Van Pelt 68 65 Ernie Els 71 70 Cameron Beckman 70 68 Nick Watney 69 68 Tommy Armour III 67 71 Suppose you would like to determine if the mean score for the first round of a PGA Tour event is significantly different than the mean score for the fourth and final round. Does the pressure of playing in the final round cause scores to go up? Or does the increased player concentration…arrow_forward
- A statistics teacher asked two different students, Lexie and Jennifer, to go to Wegmans and sample 30 shoppers each. The population of interest for both people can be defined as, “People who shop at the Johnson City, NY Wegmans store”. Here is what each person did to collect their sample: Lexie: She stood outside at the entrance to the store on 3 different days and times and surveyed every 15th person to walk by her. She surveyed 10 people each time to get her 30. Jennifer: She went to Wegmans after her nursing shift first thing Wednesday morning to buy deodorant since she ran out. When she was in the pharmacy area she surveyed all the people around her and then, to get up to 30 surveys, she went to the health food section and surveyed everyone she was there. Identify at least 2 specific reasons why Lexie’s approach is more likely to give a representative sample. Consider sources of bias, or types of shoppers who might be excluded by Jennifer’s approach.…arrow_forwardThe director of library services at a college did a survey of types of books (by subject) in the circulation library. Then she used library records to take a random sample of 888 books checked out last term and classified the books in the sample by subject. The results are shown below. Subject Area Percent of Books on Subject in CirculationLibrary on This Subject Number of Books inSample on This Subject Business 32% 237 Humanities 25% 220 Natural Science 20% 223 Social Science 15% 128 All other subjects 8% 80 Using a 5% level of significance, test the claim that the subject distribution of books in the library fits the distribution of books checked out by students. (a) What is the level of significance?State the null and alternate hypotheses. H0: The distributions are the same.H1: The distributions are different.H0: The distributions are the same.H1: The distributions are the same. H0: The distributions are different.H1: The distributions are different.H0: The…arrow_forwardA consumer group wanted to determine if there was a difference in customer perceptions about prices for a specific type of toy depending on where the toy was purchased. In the local area there are three main retailers: W-Mart, Tag, and URToy. For each retailer, the consumer group randomly selected 5 customers, and asked them to rate how expensive they thought the toy was on a 1-to-10 scale (1= not expensive, to 10 = very expensive). The toy was priced the same at all retail stores. 1. What kind of statistical test should be used to test the consumer group's research goal, assuming that the researcher wanted to use the 1-to-10 scale as a numerical interval measure? A. Repeated-measures t-test B. One-way Independent Measures ANOVA C. Repeated-measures ANOVA D. Independent-measures t-test 2. State the hypothesis that aims to test the consumer group’s research goal (i.e., what is H0 and HA).arrow_forward
- The director of library services at a college did a survey of types of books (by subject) in the circulation library. Then she used library records to take a random sample of 888 books checked out last term and classified the books in the sample by subject. The results are shown below. Subject Area Percent of Books on Subject in CirculationLibrary on This Subject Number of Books inSample on This Subject Business 32% 267 Humanities 25% 217 Natural Science 20% 222 Social Science 15% 109 All other subjects 8% 73 Using a 5% level of significance, test the claim that the subject distribution of books in the library fits the distribution of books checked out by students. (a) What is the level of significance?State the null and alternate hypotheses. H0: The distributions are different.H1: The distributions are the same.H0: The distributions are the same.H1: The distributions are different. H0: The distributions are the same.H1: The distributions are the same.H0: The…arrow_forwardThe director of library services at a college did a survey of types of books (by subject) in the circulation library. Then she used library records to take a random sample of 888 books checked out last term and classified the books in the sample by subject. The results are shown below. Subject Area Percent of Books on Subject in CirculationLibrary on This Subject Number of Books inSample on This Subject Business 32% 259 Humanities 25% 223 Natural Science 20% 213 Social Science 15% 126 All other subjects 8% 67 Using a 5% level of significance, test the claim that the subject distribution of books in the library fits the distribution of books checked out by students. (a) What is the level of significance?State the null and alternate hypotheses. H0: The distributions are different.H1: The distributions are the same.H0: The distributions are the same.H1: The distributions are the same. H0: The distributions are different.H1: The distributions are different.H0: The…arrow_forward
- Social Psychology (10th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134641287Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. SommersPublisher:Pearson College DivIntroduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)SociologyISBN:9780393639407Author:Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. AppelbaumPublisher:W. W. Norton & CompanyThe Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis...SociologyISBN:9781305503076Author:Earl R. BabbiePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien...SociologyISBN:9780134477596Author:Saferstein, RichardPublisher:PEARSONSociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134205571Author:James M. HenslinPublisher:PEARSONSociety: The Basics (14th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134206325Author:John J. MacionisPublisher:PEARSON