every functional version of the new feature as it is developed, send a pull request to the team and commit new features into the project. C) Start a new branch, commit every functional version of the new feature as it is developed, send a pull request to the team and merge new features into the project. D) Build a repository, upload files, publicize the pr

Which rules should effect exposed and traceable project components if a software industry uses diverse techniques to develop test cases?Which component helps software teams detect errors? How do you integrate a component-based system? How much must a point be adjusted? Why must you use this model? Any better ideas?

1. Requirements specification: as with the previous two models, the process begins with defining what the product is required to do. 2. Component analysis: in this step, research is done to identify existing components that could be used to achieve the above requirements. Oftentimes the match is not exact, but the component should at least provide partial functionality. HHyperion Dev 3. Requirements modification: here, the requirements themselves are adjusted to fit with the available components. If nothing can be modified, the process reverts back to step 2. 4. System design with reuse: in this step, a system design framework is created, or an existing one is adapted, to cater to the components found in step 2. New software can also be designed in this step if there are no existing components that would be appropriate to use. 5. Development and integration: the new software is created and the components found are integrated into the new system. 6. System validation: finally, the…

58. Which of these is not one of the phase names defined by the Unified Process model for software development? a. Inception phase b. Elaboration phase c. Construction phase d. Validation phase

1. Suppose you are a project manager using the waterfall development methodology on a large and complex project. Your manager has just read the latest article in Computerworld that advocates replacing the waterfall methodology with Scrum and comes to your office requesting you to switch. What do you say?

For many system development projects, the tried-and-true standard Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) has shown to be the best option. That's why people call it "traditional." Yet, there are a few drawbacks to considering this path. Can you explain the benefits and drawbacks of the SDLC methodology?

What exactly is the point of going through the SDLC process? What do you name the various levels of development?

Consider the size of a team consisting of seven to nine people working on a large project that has a well-defined design and requirements that are relatively easy to anticipate. There is no need for remote teams given that everyone is present at the same time. In what way would you suggest building software in an incremental fashion? In light of this, what are your thoughts?

Consider the following scenario: you have a team of seven to nine individuals working on a big project with a strong architecture where the needs are partly solid and all team members are onsite, implying that no remote teams exist. Which process model would you suggest for incremental software development? Give a solid reason.

You have been given the task of delivering the project ahead of time while maintaining the same level of resources at the software company where you are the lead developer (i.e. neither the salary nor the practitioners are added). In this situation: Where exactly are the risks? What kind of action would you take to address this issue if you were the leader of the team?