EPS ($) DPS ($) pay-out EPS ($) DPS ($) Ratio Year рay-out Ratio 2018 2.17 1.15 0.53 -68.45 1.00 -0.01 2017 1.99 1.03 0.52 -3.5 1.00 -0.29 2016 1.76 0.91 0.52 -18.5 2.00 -0.11 2015 1.61 0.82 0.51 4.94 2.00 0.40 2014 1.55 0.77 0.50 5.03 2.00 0.40 2013 1.51 0.73 0.48 3.35 2.00 0.60 2012 1.41 0.66 0.47 1.77 2.00 1.13 2011 1.27 0.57 0.45 6.68 2.00 0.30 For each of the stocks, do a critical analysis and suggest whether the DDM is appropriate for valuing the stocks.

Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
Amy Tanner is an analyst for a US pension fund. Her supervisor has asked her to value
the stocks of General Electric (GE) and General Motors (GM) Tanner wants to evaluate
the appropriateness of the dividend discount model (DDM) for valuing GE and GM and
has compiled the following data for the two companies from 211 to 2018.
GE
GM
EPS ($)
DPS ($) pay-out EPS ($)
Ratio
DPS ($)
Year
рay-out
Ratio
2018
2.17
1.15
0.53
-68.45
1.00
-0.01
2017
1.99
1.03
0.52
-3.5
1.00
-0.29
2016
1.76
0.91
0.52
-18.5
2.00
-0.11
2015
1.61
0.82
0.51
4.94
2.00
0.40
2014
1.55
0.77
0.50
5.03
2.00
0.40
2013
1.51
0.73
0.48
3.35
2.00
0.60
2012
1.41
0.66
0.47
1.77
2.00
1.13
2011
1.27
0.57
0.45
6.68
2.00
0.30
For each of the stocks, do a critical analysis and suggest whether the DDM is appropriate
for valuing the stocks.
Transcribed Image Text:Amy Tanner is an analyst for a US pension fund. Her supervisor has asked her to value the stocks of General Electric (GE) and General Motors (GM) Tanner wants to evaluate the appropriateness of the dividend discount model (DDM) for valuing GE and GM and has compiled the following data for the two companies from 211 to 2018. GE GM EPS ($) DPS ($) pay-out EPS ($) Ratio DPS ($) Year рay-out Ratio 2018 2.17 1.15 0.53 -68.45 1.00 -0.01 2017 1.99 1.03 0.52 -3.5 1.00 -0.29 2016 1.76 0.91 0.52 -18.5 2.00 -0.11 2015 1.61 0.82 0.51 4.94 2.00 0.40 2014 1.55 0.77 0.50 5.03 2.00 0.40 2013 1.51 0.73 0.48 3.35 2.00 0.60 2012 1.41 0.66 0.47 1.77 2.00 1.13 2011 1.27 0.57 0.45 6.68 2.00 0.30 For each of the stocks, do a critical analysis and suggest whether the DDM is appropriate for valuing the stocks.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Horizontal Analysis
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE
FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013962
Author:
BREALEY
Publisher:
RENT MCG
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Finance
ISBN:
9781337909730
Author:
Brigham
Publisher:
Cengage
Foundations Of Finance
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education