ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Emily and Celeste both work at the same company and earn $10,000 per month. Assume all income is consumed (c). There is a 3% chance that Emily will lose her job and a 6% chance that Celeste will lose her job this month. If either loses her job, she earns $0.
Celeste and Emily both have utility function C1/2
Suppose the government provides social insurance to both Celeste and Emily that will fully cover $10,000 of monthly income and charges each a premium $450. Assuming Celeste and Emily are the only participants, what is the expected cost of this program?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A risk averse agent, a risk neutral agent, and a risk loving agent each face the risky situation ($684, $193; 1-0.45, 0.45). Suppose the general form of each agent's utility function is U($X) - a ($X - $Min)^b where a is a strictly positive individual-specific-parameter and where b 0.5 for the risk averse agent and b= 2 for the risk loving agent. What is the combined total sum of the three agents' U(EV)? Please compute and state your answer up to two decimal placesarrow_forwardThree roommates are trying to renovate their kitchen. They decided to vote on whether or not it is worth renovating. If at least 2 people vote for the renovation, then it will happen and everyone would split the costs of renovation equally. Their utility functions are U1= (1+ R)y1; U2 = (2 + R)Y2 and U3 if the kitchen is renovated and 0 otherwise, and y;is the amount of money i spends on private consumption. Agent 1 has $900; Agent 2 has $2100 and Agent 3 has $1500; renovation project costs $1500 total. (3 + R)y3, where R=1 1. Will the house be renovated if no bribes are allowed? 2. Can they reach an agreement so that the house ends up being renovated?arrow_forwardBilly's income Is equal to / = 100 and his utility function is U = [?. There is a 10% chance that he will be in an accident next year with his skateboard that will cause $70 worth of damage. Get the risk premium for Billy. b. An Insurance company offers a policy that will cover all the damages if an accident occurs Calculate the fair price for the insurance. %3D a.arrow_forward
- Hi! Can you help me with the question below? Todd has a job that presents zero risk of death or injury, but has always craved something more exciting. His current annual salary is $50,000. He has been offered a job on an Alaskan fishing boat that will pay$55,000 annually. This new job offer, however, comes with a 10% risk of severe injury that will cause Todd to have no income. Which of the following is true? (Assume the severe injury has no relevant implications besides reducing Todd’s income) A) Todd will definitely take the new job if he’s risk averse.B) Todd will definitely take the new job if he’s risk neutral.C) Todd will definitely decline the new job if he’s risk averse or risk neutral.D) Todd will definitely accept the new job if he’s risk seeking.E) Not enough information to determine.arrow_forwardSuppose Lesley is deciding on career paths. She could choose career A, which earns $50,000 per year and has a 10% chance of layoff each year, or career B, which earns 80,000 per year and has a 30% chance of layoff each year. When laid off, she earns 0. Suppose her utility over annual earnings is equal to U(E) = VE (a) What would be her preferred job if she had to choose one or the other? If she could allocate her time to both jobs (e.g., could spend 90% of time in job A and 10% in job B) what would be her ideal allocation of time between jobs?arrow_forwardFred wants to hire Barney to manage his retail store. Barney can apply a high level of effort (at a cost to him of $30), a medium level of effort (at a cost to him of $10), or a low level of effort (at a cost to him of $0). Fred's profits depend not only of the level of Barney's effort but also on the state of consumer demand. Fred believes that demand will be high with probability 50 percent (and therefore demand will be low with probability 50 percent). Fred has determined the following possible profit levels (before paying Barney) will occur depending on Barney's effort and the state of consumer demand: Demand low high effort low 20 40 medium 40 80 high 80 100 Of the choices below, what is the largest percentage range of profit provided to Barney that would ensure Barney would supply high effort? a. any percent greater than 75.00 percent (3/4). b. any percent greater than 66.66 percent (2/3). c. any percent greater than 50.00 percent (1/2).d. any…arrow_forward
- Nicolaus I Bernoulli offers his friend Pierre Rémond de Montmort a game where they need to repeatedly toss a fair ducat until they get a head for the first time. The game stops then, and they count the number n of coin tosses it took to get the desired outcome, and Montmort gets 2^n ducats. Assume that Montmort's utility function is u(w)=w^0.14. How much should Montmort pay to play this game?arrow_forward3. Let us consider a utility function: U(x) = (V2x -1. (200sxs800) We have LiL2 where L1=(1, Y) and L2=(0.3, 450, 0.7,648). a. Determine the value of Y. b. Determine RP (Risk Premium) of L2.arrow_forwardSuppose your preferences can characterized by the simple utility function U = √C, where C is consumption. You enjoy rock climbing, where you have a 10% chance of get- ting injured and losing $50,000. Your income (and therefore consumption) in the uninjured state is $90,000. What is the most you are willing to pay for an insurance policy? What is the fee for a fair insurance?arrow_forward
- E2arrow_forwardPersons A and B are roommates. Person A smokes and Person B does not. The index s measures how smoky the room is. It varies from s=0, where there is no smoke in the room, to s=1, when the room is filled with smoke. Thus, 1-s measures how "clean" the air in the room is. Person A's utility function is UA(XA,S)=XA+In(1+s), where xA is the amount of money Person A owns. Person B's utility function is uB(XB,1s)%3D3XB+2(1-s), where Xg is the amount of money Person B owns. Each person starts with an endowment of 5 units of money. Persch B has the legal right to a smoke-free room and there is a market for "emission right." At the Walrasian equilibrium, what will be the (per unit of smoke index) price p of the emission rights if the price of money is 1? O a. None of the other answers. O b. p=2/3 O c. p=1 O d. p=3/2 О е. р31/6arrow_forwardSuppose you manage a factory with ten workers. Each worker’s output is determined by the equation q = e. Output sells in the market for a price of 40. The firm has fixed cost equal to 800, and variable costs aside from labor are 8 per unit of output. Worker utility is U = w – e2. Suppose you are paying workers a wage equal to bq. What is the profit- maximizing value of b? Suppose that the probability of worker error increases as the worker increases effort, and that worker error results in unusable output. Suppose that the probability of worker error is Pr[Error] = e/10. Then for worker effort level e, expected (usable) output is now determined by the equation E[q] = (1-Pr[Error]) x e. However, the problem is that you cannot detect errors until after the product is shipped to customers, meaning you pay workers for output before you know whether it is usable or not, and you have to refund your customers for unusable output. Demonstrate why you should not pay your workers the same…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education