nomic Theory: Micro Page Consider a market with two firms (Firm 1 and Firm 2), which produce an identical good. Both firms have the same constant marginal cost: MC = m = 40. The demand in this market is given by: Q = 100 – .25p p = 400 – 4Q Let p1, 91, and T, denote the price charged by firm 1, the quantity firm 1 produces and sells, and firm 1's profits, respectively. Analogously, let p2,92, and t, denote the price, the quantity, and profits for firm 2. When appropriate, assume the firms split total quantity and profits evenly. a. Assume that consumers in this market demand Q = 50 and the two firms compete by choosing prices simultaneously (Bertrand oligopoly with identical products). What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? How does this equilibrium compare to a perfectly competitive equilibrium? b. Assume now that the two firms compete by choosing quantities simultaneously (Cournot oligopoly with identical products). What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? c. Assume now that the two firms now collude to act as monopolist. That is, they form a cartel. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? d. Compare the equilibrium price, quantities, and profits in the Bertrand, Cournot, and Cartel cases. Which market structure is the most efficient in terms of total welfare, which benefits consumers the most, and which benefits producers the most? Hint: You do not need to calculate the surpluses, an economic argumentation supported by your previous answers is enough. 99+ onomic Theory: Micro Page equilibrium? c. Assume now that the two firms now collude to act as monopolist. That is, they form a cartel. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? d. Compare the equilibrium price, quantities, and profits in the Bertrand, Cournot, and Cartel cases. Which market structure is the most efficient in terms of total welfare, which benefits consumers the most, and which benefits producers the most? Hint: You do not need to calculate the surpluses, an economic argumentation supported by your previous answers is enough. e. Assume that the two firms compete by choosing their quantities sequentially (Stackelberg oligopoly with identical products). Assume further, that firm 1 moves first. What will be the price, quantity, and profit for each firm in equilibrium? Compared to the Cournot-Nash equilibrium, which firm is better off and which firm is worse off? Why? 99+ U

Where did the 1/2 come from or what is it.

can u solve d and e

I cannot read the hand writing can someone tyoe this out for mr please ?

Imagine you are the mayor of a town and you are trying to decide if you should pay for a fireworks show. Your staff survey your 400 citizens who say that they each value a fireworks show at $10. The fireworks show only costs $3,000 so you put on the show but when you ask for donations to pay for the fireworks you only receive $25 total. What does this result show? Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up/down arrow keys to select an answer. You staff's survey must have overestimated the value of a fireworks show. b The fireworks cost must have been greater than their economic benefit. The firework show suffered from the Tragedy of the Commons problems d The town's citizens were free-riders.

A sentence that contains a metaphor

Trying to figure out?

how about questions d and e?

Answer parts d and e