Don't just argue that deep access is superior because it's faster; provide concrete examples of how a programmer might benefit from it.

Why  is it more difficult to build quality in software than that in hardware like in bridge and airplane?

Avoid making a purely performance-based case for why deep access is preferable to shallow access and instead focus on the programmer's perspective.

Programs written at a higher level may be translated into more basic ones using Composer. The speed of the central processing unit is affected by the compiler. I don't see why we shouldn't at least entertain the idea. But the question of how to react still remains. If you believe you know the solution, please explain why.