Does this imply that developers should be concerned with writing maintainable code even when their employers are not?

If a software engineer's professional job is to produce code that is easy to maintain, even if their employer does not expressly require it, does this imply that the engineer has a professional obligation to do so?

Should developers prioritise writing maintainable code even if their company doesn't?

How does the use of interfaces contribute to code reusability and maintainability in software development?

Does this suggest that developers have a responsibility to prioritize the development of code that is easily maintainable, even if their employer does not prioritize it?

A programmer develops code by repeating short sessions of writing, compiling, and testing until the project is finished. This is an example of _____. A. Pair programming B. Modular development C. Incremental development D. Parallel programming

Do developers have a responsibility to provide readily maintainable code, even if it's not something their company has asked for? -

Does this imply that programmers have an ethical or moral responsibility to create code that can be maintained even if the corporation that employs them decides not to?

Is it possible to use a certain kind of candidate system while creating a system?

As a result, the question of whether programmers have an ethical or moral duty to create code that can be maintained independently of their company arises?