distribution. What are the tax consequences to George because of the transaction?   Question 11 options:

Pit Coporation owns 75% of Stop Company's outstanding common stock.  On 08/28/21, Pit sold inventory to Stop in exchange for $540,000 cash.  Pit had purchased the inventory on 05/02/21 at a cost of $324,000. On 12/21/21, Stop sold 80% of the inventory to 3rd parties at a cash price of $720,000.  The other 20% of the inventory remains on hand at 12/31/21. Pit's Journal Entries would include: To Acquire The Inventory: A debit to Inventory and a credit to Cash in the amount of:   To Sell the Inventory to Stop: A debit to Cash and a credit to Sales in the amount of: A debit to Cost of Goods Sold and a credit to Inventory in the amount of:

Damarcus is a 50 percent owner of Hoop (a business entity). In the current year, Hoop reported a $100,000 business loss. Answer the following questions associated with each of the following alternative scenarios. (Leave no answer blank. Enter zero if applicable.)   a. Hoop is organized as a C corporation and Damarcus works full-time as an employee for Hoop. Damarcus has a $20,000 basis in his Hoop stock. How much of Hoop’s loss is Damarcus allowed to deduct against his other income?     Allowable deduction of loss

Charla Corporation is owned eighty percent (80%) by Jeanette and twenty percent (20%) by Victoria who are unrelated to each other. At the time of a Complete Liquidation, Charla Corporation owned Land that had a Fair Market Value of $100,000 and a basis to Charla Corporation of $400,000. The Land was acquired by Charla Corporation in a Section 351 Transfer two (2) years ago from Victoria when its Fair Market Value was $200,000. (Assume that there was no business purpose for the transfer). Pursuant to the Complete Liquidation, the Land is sold to an unrelated third party for $100,000 and the $100,000 proceeds of the sale are distributed proportionately (pro-rata) to Jeanette and Victoria (ie. eighty percent (80%) to Jeanette and twenty percent (20%) to Victoria). The Recognized Loss to Charla Corporation is: A. $500.00 B. $300.00 C $200.00 D. SO

Nail Corporation made a distribution of $589, 110 to Rusty in partial liquidation of the company on December 31 of this year. Rusty, an individual, owns 100 percent of Nail Corporation. The distribution was in exchange for 50 percent of Rusty's stock in the company. At the time of the distribution, the shares had a fair market value of $219 per share. Rusty's tax basis in the shares was $ 50 per share. Nail had total E&P of $8,485,000 at the time of the distribution. a. What are the amount and character (capital gain or dividend) of any income or gain recognized by Rusty because of the partial liquidation? Capital gain/ Dividend . . . . . . . ./ per share b. Assuming Nail made no other distributions to Rusty during the year, by what amount does Nail reduce its total E&P because of the partial liquidation?

Cairns owns 75 percent of the voting stock of Hamilton, Incorporated. The parent’s interest was acquired several years ago on the date that the subsidiary was formed. Consequently, no goodwill or other allocation was recorded in connection with the acquisition. Cairns uses the equity method in its internal records to account for its investment in Hamilton. On January 1, 2020, Hamilton sold $2,000,000 in 10-year bonds to the public at 110. The bonds had a cash interest rate of 8 percent payable every December 31. Cairns acquired 40 percent of these bonds at 92 percent of face value on January 1, 2022. Both companies utilize the straight-line method of amortization. Required: Prepare the consolidation worksheet entries to recognize the effects of the intra-entity bonds at each of the following dates. Note: If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No journal entry required" in the first account field. December 31, 2022 December 31, 2023 December 31, 2024

Wilcox, chief executive officer and chairman of the board of directors, owned 60 percent of the shares of Sterling Corporation. When the market price of Sterling’s shares was $22 per share, Wilcox sold all of his shares in Sterling to Conrad for $29 per share. The minority shareholders of Sterling brought suit against Wilcox, demanding a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price. a. What are the arguments to support the minority shareholders’ claim for a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price? b. What are the arguments to reject the minority shareholders’ claim for a pro rata share of the amount Wilcox received in excess of the market price? c. Which side should prevail?

Acorn Corporation owns 80 percent of Beet Corporation's common stock. It purchased the shares on January 1, 20X1, for $640,000. At the date of acquisition, the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $160,000, and Beet reported common stock outstanding of $360,000 and retained earnings of $180,000. The differential is assigned to a trademark with a life of five years. Each year since acquisition, Beet has reported income from operations of $68,000 and paid dividends of $20,000. Beet purchases 70 percent ownership of Corn Company on January 1, 20X3, for $427,000. At that date, the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was $183,000, and Corn reported common stock outstanding of $250,000 and retained earnings of $300,000. In 20X3, Corn reported net income of $42,000 and paid dividends of $20,000. The differential is assigned to buildings and equipment with an economic life of 10 years at the date of acquisition. Required: Prepare the journal entries recorded by Beet for its…

Cairns owns 75 percent of the voting stock of Hamilton, Inc. The parent’s interest was acquired several years ago on the date that the subsidiary was formed. Consequently, no goodwill or other allocation was recorded in connection with the acquisition. Cairns uses the equity method in its internal records to account for its investment in Hamilton.   On January 1, 2017, Hamilton sold $1,200,000 in 10-year bonds to the public at 115. The bonds had a cash interest rate of 9 percent payable every December 31. Cairns acquired 40 percent of these bonds at 88 percent of face value on January 1, 2019. Both companies utilize the straight-line method of amortization.   Prepare the consolidation worksheet entries to recognize the effects of the intra-entity bonds at each of the following dates. (If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No journal entry required" in the first account field.) December 31, 2019 December 31, 2020 December 31, 2021

Cairns owns 70 percent of the voting stock of Hamilton, Inc. The parent’s interest was acquired several years ago on the date that the subsidiary was formed. Consequently, no goodwill or other allocation was recorded in connection with the acquisition. Cairns uses the equity method in its internal records to account for its investment in Hamilton.   On January 1, 2014, Hamilton sold $2,300,000 in 10-year bonds to the public at 110. The bonds had a cash interest rate of 9 percent payable every December 31. Cairns acquired 35 percent of these bonds at 92 percent of face value on January 1, 2016. Both companies utilize the straight-line method of amortization. Prepare the consolidation worksheet entries to recognize the effects of the intra-entity bonds at each of the following dates. (If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No journal entry required" in the first account field.) December 31, 2016 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2018