Discuss the GRANT statement's consequences on intellectual property rights. What rewards may one anticipate from obtaining the different rights, and how does one do so? Will they have to give up their licenses?

Question 1 Which of the following correctly describes the difference between privacy and security?     Privacy is about the individual's control over sensitive information pertaining to the individual; security is about the methods used to provide control over information.   Privacy is about controlling access to personal information; security is about controlling access to company information.   None of the listed choices are correct.   Privacy and security refer to the sets of controls used to protect information.     Question 2   Extended service agreements which run for 3 more years require that Sifers-Grayson provide software maintenance and patches for SCADA systems sold more than fifteen years ago. The engineering workstations used to provide this support take up 500 sq ft of space in the R&D lab and, due to their reliance on Windows XP, present security vulnerabilities which need to…

I would appreciate it if you could use some real-world examples to illustrate the distinctions between digital piracy and intellectual property infringement, as this would help me to comprehend both concepts.

Describe the possible effects of the GRANT statement and how they affect the protection of intellectual property rights. What benefits might one expect from earning the various privileges on offer, and how does one go about doing so? What are the possibilities that they will eventually be required to renounce their licenses?