Determine the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: P H₁: P (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) Identify the correlation coefficient, r. r= (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Identify the critical value(s). (Round to three decimal places as needed.) OA. There are two critical values at r= t B. There is one critical value at r= ▼ Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? Choose the correct answer below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box within your choice. (Round to three decimal places as needed.) OA. Yes, because the absolute value of the test statistic OB. No, because the test statistic OC. Yes, because the test statistic falls between the critical values. OD. No, because the absolute value of the test statistic exceeds the critical value. OE. The answer cannot be determined from the given information. When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight? exceeds the critical value. ... falls between the critical values. OA. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could be used to predict weight because there is a linear correlation between the two. OB. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could not be used to predict weight because there is not a linear correlation between the two. OC. Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than a weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could not be used to predict weight because there is too much variance in the weight of the bears. D. No, it is easier to measure weight than chest size because the chest is not a flat surface.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
7
### Study on the Correlation between Weight and Chest Size in Bears

**Objective:** 
Analyze whether there is a linear correlation between the weights and chest sizes of anesthetized bears and determine if chest size can predict weight.

---

**Experiment Description:**
Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in a dataset. 

**Research Question:** 
Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight? The test uses a significance level of \(\alpha = 0.05\).

---

**Statistical Analysis:**

1. **Determine the Null and Alternative Hypotheses:**
    - **\(H_0\)**: \(\rho = 0\)
    - **\(H_1\)**: \(\rho \neq 0\)

2. **Correlation Coefficient:**
    - Identify the correlation coefficient, \(r\).
    - Given: \(r = 0.969394\)

3. **Critical Value(s):**
    - Identify the critical value(s) (rounded to three decimal places).
    - Two critical values: \(\pm 0.2680855\)

4. **Evaluating Sufficient Evidence for Linear Correlation:**
    - Determine if there is sufficient evidence to support the claim using the correlation test.
    - Given \(r = 0.969394\) which exceeds the critical value of 0.2680855.
    - Conclusion: Yes, because the absolute value of the test statistic exceeds the critical value.

---

**Practical Implications:**

When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?

- **Options for Practical Implications:**
    - **A.** Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could be used to predict weight because there is a linear correlation between the two.
    - **B.** Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest
Transcribed Image Text:### Study on the Correlation between Weight and Chest Size in Bears **Objective:** Analyze whether there is a linear correlation between the weights and chest sizes of anesthetized bears and determine if chest size can predict weight. --- **Experiment Description:** Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in a dataset. **Research Question:** Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight? The test uses a significance level of \(\alpha = 0.05\). --- **Statistical Analysis:** 1. **Determine the Null and Alternative Hypotheses:** - **\(H_0\)**: \(\rho = 0\) - **\(H_1\)**: \(\rho \neq 0\) 2. **Correlation Coefficient:** - Identify the correlation coefficient, \(r\). - Given: \(r = 0.969394\) 3. **Critical Value(s):** - Identify the critical value(s) (rounded to three decimal places). - Two critical values: \(\pm 0.2680855\) 4. **Evaluating Sufficient Evidence for Linear Correlation:** - Determine if there is sufficient evidence to support the claim using the correlation test. - Given \(r = 0.969394\) which exceeds the critical value of 0.2680855. - Conclusion: Yes, because the absolute value of the test statistic exceeds the critical value. --- **Practical Implications:** When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight? - **Options for Practical Implications:** - **A.** Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest size could be used to predict weight because there is a linear correlation between the two. - **B.** Yes, it is easier to measure a chest size than weight because measuring weight would require lifting the bear onto the scale. The chest
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman