Database systems are often made up of processes (also known as threads) that interact with shared memory resources to communicate with one another. What, if any, restrictions are placed on access to the shared memory space? Is two-phase locking the most acceptable strategy for serialising access to data structures in shared memory? Your answer should be backed up by logic.

Database systems are often made up of processes (also known as threads) that interact with shared memory resources to communicate with one another. What, if any, restrictions are placed on access to the shared memory space? Is two-phase locking the most acceptable strategy for serialising access to data structures in shared memory? Your answer should be backed up by logic.

Fundamentals of Information Systems

9th Edition

ISBN:9781337097536

Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Publisher:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds

Chapter3: Database Systems And Big Data

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 16SAT

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Database systems are often comprised of processes (also known as threads) that communicate with one another by interacting with shared memory resources.What, if any, access to the shared memory area is controlled.Is two-phase locking the most acceptable strategy for serializing access to data structures in shared memory? Your answer should be backed up by logic.
Database systems are usually built as a collection of processes (or threads) that communicate with one another via shared memory resources.The access to the shared memory region is restricted in what way, if at all.In order to serialise access to data structures in shared memory, is two-phase locking the most suitable method of doing so? Give an explanation for your response.
Oftentimes, database systems are made up of processes (also known as threads) that communicate with one another via interacting with shared memory resources.Access to the shared memory space is restricted in what way, if at all.When it comes to serializing access to data structures in shared memory, is two-phase locking the most acceptable technique? Your response should be supported by reasoning.
Processes (also known as threads) interact with one another in many database systems through shared memory resources.It is critical to determine if the shared memory area is constrained.What is the most efficient method for serialising access to shared memory data? Your reaction must be rational.
Database systems are often composed of processes (or threads) that interact with one another through shared memory resources.How, if at all, access to the shared memory area is limited.Is two-phase locking the best appropriate technique for serializing access to data structures in shared memory? Give a reason for your answer.
Distributed database systems, like other distributed systems, have a concurrency management challenge that is comparable to that of other distributed systems. Is it necessary to enforce concurrency management strategies such as 2PL (Two-phase locking) on a system given that components are not duplicated? Explain.
How does the "isolation vs. latency" trade-off play out in high-concurrency database systems?
What are the primary distinctions between a local-area network and a wide-area network when it comes to accessing a distributed database?
Consider the various data request scenarios that could occur in a distributed database system.
Take, for example, a snapshot-isolated database management system like the one employed by an airline. I was wondering if you could provide me an example of a non-serializable execution that the airline is willing to endure in exchange for greater speed.
Concurrency control is a problem for distributed database systems, just as it is for other kinds of distributed systems. Is the use of concurrency management techniques like two-phase locking (2PL) really essential in a setup where no parts are duplicated? Explain.
When it comes to the construction of a distributed database, what are the most significant differences that can be found between a local-area network and a wide-area network?