Could you perhaps elaborate on why the interactive method is superior than the waterfall method in terms of the amount of effort required? I really appreciate your time.

Which technique, the conventional waterfall or the more flexible iterative waterfall, would you choose and why? Do you have any suggestions that could assist us in resolving this?

How come the number of iterations in the waterfall approach is capped? The issue of why things are as they are arises from this.

What are the similarities and differences between the iterative and incremental approach and the waterfall model? How do they compare and contrast with one another?

If you had to choose between the waterfall technique and a more modern approach, you may choose with the former. Which of these two approaches, the current waterfall methodology that is iteratively adaptive, would you choose? Do you have any suggestions on how we may improve this?

Could you please explain why the interactive technique is preferable to the waterfall approach when it comes to the quantity of work that has to be done? Thank you so much for your time.

Why is the number of iterations in the waterfall approach capped at a certain amount? The reason why things are the way they are is now in doubt.

Why are there limits placed on the number of iterations when using the waterfall methodology? The question then becomes why anything like this would occur?

If you were put in a position where you had to choose between the waterfall technique and something that was more applicable to the present world, do you think you would choose the waterfall method?

Why is there a limit placed on the number of iterations that may be performed using the waterfall methodology? It is no longer clear why things have developed in the manner in which they have.