Consider two separate perfectly competitive markets with downward sloping demand and no externalities. Demand is identical in both markets. Supply is different, bu perfectly inelastic in both markets. The government has imposed a price CEILING at $5 in both markets. The price ceiling is binding in market BIND. In market NOBIN the same $5 price ceiling, is not binding. Trade is not permitted across markets. Which of the statement below is TRUE O Producers will want to move from NOBIND to BIND if they are able to. O If the two markets combine into one merged market with the same price ceiling of $5, more total goods will be traded compared to when they are separate. O If we remove the price ceiling in BIND, more goods will be traded. O Producers will want to move from BIND to NOBIND if they are able to.

Consider two separate perfectly competitive markets with downward sloping demand and no externalities. Demand is identical in both markets. Supply is different, bu perfectly inelastic in both markets. The government has imposed a price CEILING at $5 in both markets. The price ceiling is binding in market BIND. In market NOBIN the same $5 price ceiling, is not binding. Trade is not permitted across markets. Which of the statement below is TRUE O Producers will want to move from NOBIND to BIND if they are able to. O If the two markets combine into one merged market with the same price ceiling of $5, more total goods will be traded compared to when they are separate. O If we remove the price ceiling in BIND, more goods will be traded. O Producers will want to move from BIND to NOBIND if they are able to.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Can you help me with this please? Can you explain how to factor in consumer and producer surpluses With substitute and complement goods?
may you please help me solve this. thank you
The market for mandrake root in Sodden is perfectly competitive. Market demad is given by Q = 477 - 3P and market supply is given by Q = 3P. the government is concerned about the high prices and imposes a price ceiling of $7. What is the quntitiy traded in the market with this price ceiling? Enter a number only.
The figure shows the market for buckets of golf balls at the driving range. A new leisure time tax is placed on suppliers in this market, shifting the supply curve from So to S₁. The amount of this tax per bucket of golf balls. IS QA. $2 OB. $2.50 O C. $4 OD. $1 OE. $3
40
Using the figure to the right, fill in the table under the assumption that a rent ceiling is set at $1,200 (if your answer is not a whole number, round at 2 decimal places). Consumer Surplus In Competitive Equilibrium $ million In Competitive Equilibrium $ million In Competitive Equilibrium $ million O A. B only O B. D only O C. C and E O D. B and D O E. D and E Producer Surplus Click to select your answer(s). Deadweight Loss Under Rent Control $ million Under Rent Control S million Compared to the competitive equilibrium what area(s) were transferred from producer surplus to the consumer? Under Rent Control S million $3,200 Rent (dollars per month) 2,400.A. 1,600 1,200 800 B D 199 Supply Rent ceiling ************ Demand Q 1.30 2.60 Quantity (apartments per month in millions)
In the figure, the supply curve that includes external costs is O A. S₁. O B. neither S, nor S₂ because the curve would be horizontal. OC. S₂- O D. neither S, nor S₂ because the curve would be vertical. Price P₂ N P₁ S2 Q₁ Q₂ Quantity per Time Period S₁
Currently the price for wheat is $5 per bushel. To help the farmers, the government promises that it will buy any wheat that farmers can't sell at a price of $6 per bushel. Select one. O a This will decrease producer surplus. O b This is an example of quota. O c This will decrease consumer surplus. O d This is an example of price ceiling
PRICE (Dollars per used smart device) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 4 0 Musashi Statement 1 Y X Rina ロロ Sean Yvette ☐ ■ Bob 2 3 4 QUANTITY (Used smart devices) ロロ L 5 Cho 0 ➜ 6 Region X (the purple shaded area) represents total producer surplus when the market price is equal to $ area) represents when the market price In the following table, indicate which statements are true or false based on the information provided on the previous graph. Assuming each seller receives a positive surplus, Rina will always receive more producer surplus than Sean. while Region Y (the grey shaded Producer surplus is larger when the price is $70 than when it is $50. True In order for Bob to earn a producer surplus of exactly $30 from selling a used smart device, the market price must be $ False
Using your knowledge from Topics 1-7, which of the following statements about Pareto optimal outcomes is false? Every outcome which is Pareto optimal must be a Pareto improvement over all other outcomes. An outcome which maximises total surplus is always Pareto optimal. Pareto optimal outcomes can be ordered in terms of total surplus. An equilibrium in a competitive market is an outcome which is Pareto optimal. O None of the above. No answer.
DROP OFF BU rEDAY @UPM 27 9. DEADWEIGHT LOSS WITH PRICE CONTROLS If an equilibrium position is less than perfectly efficient, the loss in total surplus (CS + PS) is termed "deadweight loss." If D and S are linear, then DWL is measured as the area a triangle, the "loss triangle." The area of a triangle is half of (base X height). > Suppose that demand and supply equations in a competitive market are: Demand: P = 30 – 0.6Q Supply: P = 6 + 0.4Q a. Compute the market equilibrium. (Q*, P*) = ( b. Calculate consumer surplus and producer surplus at the market equilibrium. Producer surplus (PS) is the area above the supply curve and below the price. CS* = PS* = C. Suppose that a price floor of Pr = 24 is imposed by the government. Find the equilibrium quantity with the price floor. Then calculate consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss at the regulated equilibrium. CSt = PS = DWL =
Why might producers argue for a price floor if it ends up making society worse off?