Consider the benefits and drawbacks listed in this article when determining if the waterfall approach is right for your project.

Which waterfall model would you choose for your project—traditional or iterative? What's the solution?

Which of the two waterfall models—the classic and the iterative—would you choose to use for your project and why? What, in your view, must be done to fix this problem?

You may determine whether the waterfall approach is suitable for your project by comparing it to the one used in the article.

The results might lead to an increase in the scope of the project or the introduction of brand new features. Please provide concrete examples so that we may better understand the differences between the two ideas. What, in your opinion, do you think the root cause of these two problems is? What would happen if these two unfavorable outcomes happened simultaneously, making this endeavor the worst-case situation that could possibly occur?

Which kind of waterfall architecture, the standard waterfall model or the iterative waterfall model, would you use for the successful conclusion of the project that you are working on? What do you suppose will take place to resolve this issue, in your view, and why do you feel it will?

What are the steps involved in a waterfall project? The history, philosophy, and ideas of Barry Boehm's spiral model would be intriguing to learn more about.

Think through the article's pros and downsides if you're attempting to decide whether the waterfall method is right for your project.

What are the parallels and differences that exist between the waterfall strategy and the incremental approach? What are the things that they have in common, as well as the ways in which they differ?

Why would you utilize iterative waterfall vs regular waterfall for your project? What's your solution?