Consider the argument form: p ∧ ~q → r p ∨ q q→ p Therefore r. Construct a truth table to determine whether this argument form is valid or invalid. Explain how your truth table supports your answer.

Construct a truth table using T and F to determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.   T: True F: False

For the argument below, perform the following. a) Translate the argument into symbolic form. b) Use a truth table to determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. (Ignore differences in past, present, and future tense.) If you're happy, you smile. You're not happy. :: You don't smile. a) Let p be "You're happy" and let q be "You smile." What is the argument in symbolic form? OA p q -P 1:49 OC.-49 49 b) is the given argument valid or invalid? OA. The argument is invalid because its corresponding statement is not a tautology. B. The argument is invalid because its corresponding statement is a tautology. OC. The argument is valid because its corresponding statement is a tautology. D. The argument is valid because its corresponding statement is not a tautology. OB. p-q P 1-9 OD. p-q Р :.q

Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. No A are B, all B are C, and no C are D. Thus, no A are D. This argument is because