Consider data on births to women in the United States. Two variables of interest are the dependent variable, infant birth weight in ounces (bwght), and an explanatory variable, average number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day during pregnancy (cigs). The following simple regression was estimated using data on n = 1,388 births: 119.772 (0.572) 1,388, 0.514 cigs (0.091) R² = 0.0227, bwght = n = where standard errors are shown in parenthesis. A. What percent of the variation in birth weight is explained by cigs? B. What is the predicted birth weight when cigs = 0? What about when cigs = 20 (one pack per day)? Comment on the difference.

Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Chapter4: Estimating Demand
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 3E
icon
Related questions
Question
A.
B.
Consider data on births to women in the United States. Two variables of interest
are the dependent variable, infant birth weight in ounces (bwght), and an explanatory variable,
average number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day during pregnancy (cigs). The
following simple regression was estimated using data on n = 1,388 births:
bwght =
119.772
(0.572)
n = 1,388,
0.514 cigs
(0.091)
R² = 0.0227,
where standard errors are shown in parenthesis.
What percent of the variation in birth weight is explained by cigs?
What is the predicted birth weight when cigs = 0? What about when cigs = 20 (one pack
per day)? Comment on the difference.
Transcribed Image Text:A. B. Consider data on births to women in the United States. Two variables of interest are the dependent variable, infant birth weight in ounces (bwght), and an explanatory variable, average number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day during pregnancy (cigs). The following simple regression was estimated using data on n = 1,388 births: bwght = 119.772 (0.572) n = 1,388, 0.514 cigs (0.091) R² = 0.0227, where standard errors are shown in parenthesis. What percent of the variation in birth weight is explained by cigs? What is the predicted birth weight when cigs = 0? What about when cigs = 20 (one pack per day)? Comment on the difference.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Autocorrelation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning