ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN: 9780190931919
Author: NEWNAN
Publisher: Oxford University Press
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Question
-
Consider a two country, two goods, one factor (labor) model of international trade. Suppose home country require 1 units of labor to produce a unit of cloth and 1 unit of labor to produce a unit of wine (regardless of output levels). Foreign country requires 2 unit of labor to produce 1 unit of cloth and 1.5 units of labor to produce 1 unit of wine (regardless of output levels).
-
(a) Which country has the
comparative advantage in producing wine? Justify your answer. -
(b) Which country has the
absolute advantage in producing wine? -
(c) Which country will have higher autarky price of wine in terms of cloth?
-
-
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps with 1 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- With respect to international trade, specialization means that Multiple Choice each country consumes what it produces. labor is exported or imported in much the same way as other products. most goods and services that are traded internationally are produced in only 1 or 2 nations. labor and other resources in a nation are used to produce the products and services for which they are best suited.arrow_forwardConsider an international trade model consisting of three countries X, Y, and Z. Suppose X uses domestically, sends of its production to Y, and sends of its production to Z. Suppose Y uses domestically, sends of its production to X, and sends of its production to Z. Suppose Z uses sends of its production to X and sends of its production to Y. Assume this is a closed Leontief model. of its production of its production of its domestic goods, If we know country Z produced 124 thousand units of goods, then country X produces country Y produces thousand units of goods. thousand units of goods andarrow_forwardConsider a simplified example of two countries - Singapore and Indonesia - producing two goods – telecommunications equipment and electrical circuit apparatus. Using all its resources, Singapore can produce either 50 telecommunications equipment, or 100 electrical circuit apparatus. Using all its resources, Indonesia can produce either 1,000 telecommunications equipment, or 5,000 circuit apparatus. (a) Which country/countries has/have the absolute advantages and the comparative advantages in the production of telecommunications equipment, and of electrical circuit apparatus? Explain and show. (b) Consider the case of constant opportunity cost. What will be the resulting patterns of trade, terms-of-trade, and the aggregate production and consumption? Provide a diagram to illustrate, with telecommunications equipment on the y-axis. (c) It is found that contrary to the above, there is no complete specialisation in both Singapore and Indonesia. Instead, Singapore partially specialises in…arrow_forward
- Two countries, Home (H) and Foreign (F) trade agricultural and manufacturing goods (A and M, respectively). Production of either good requires skilled and unskilled labor. Unskilled workers can freely move from one sector to another, while skilled workers cannot. Identify mobile and industry-specific factors of production (b) Suppose Home is relatively more productive in agriculture than Foreign. Draw two diagrams, one for H one for F, which illustrate no-trade equilibrium in each county. Compare relative price of agricultural goods in two countries.arrow_forwardSuppose Canada can produce cars at an opportunity cost of 2 computers for each car it produces. Suppose Mexico can produce cars at an opportunity cost of 8 computers for each car it produces. Indicate how both countries can gain from free trade.arrow_forwardAssume that the comparative-cost ratios of two products-baby formula and tuna fish-are as follows in the nations of Canswicki and Tunata: Canswicki: 1 can baby formula = 3 cans tuna fish Tunata: 1 can baby formula = 5 cans tuna fish a. In what product should each nation specialize? Canswicki should produce [(Click to select), and Tunata should produce [(Click to select) ♥ b. Would the following terms of trade be acceptable to both nations? i. 1 can baby formula = 2 cans tuna fish: (Click to select) ii. 1 can baby formula = 3.5 cans tuna fish: (Click to select) iii. 1 can baby formula = 6 cans tuna fish: (Click to select)arrow_forward
- Answer the following with complete solution What is the production level of X and Y in nation A and nation B if they decide to trade? What is the level of consumption of nations A and B after trade? Show whether each nation will improve its welfare if it trades with another nation. Show full solutionarrow_forward? illustrate an example of trade induced by comparative advantage. They assume that China and France each have 1,000 production units. With one unit of production (a mix of land, labor, capital, and technology), China can produce either 10 containers of toys or 7 cases of wine. France can produce either 2 cases of toys or 7 cases of wine. Thus, a production unit in China is five times as efficient compared to France when producing toys, but equally efficient when producing wine. Assume at first that no trade takes place. China allocates 800 production units to building toys and 200 production units to producing wine. France allocates 200 production units to building toys and 800 production units to producing wine. Trade at France’s Domestic Price. France’s domestic price is 2 containers of toys equals 7 cases of wine. Assume China produces 10,000 containers of toys and exports 400 containers to France. Assume France in turn produces 7,000 cases of wine and exports 1,400…arrow_forwardThe following hypothetical production possibilities tables for China and Canada. Assume that, before specialization and trade, the optimal product mix for China is alternative D and for Canada is alternative S.arrow_forward
- Assume that there are two countries, Country A, which earns $5,000 per capita GDP, and Country B, which earns $50,000 per capita GDP. Using Country A and Country B and two products that you choose, thoroughly and clearly explain an example of how these countries can gain from trade pursuant to the doctrine of Comparative Advantage.arrow_forwardFinally, Canada and Australia are both English-speaking countries with not-too dissimilar population sizes. However, Canada’s trade is twice as large as that of Australia’s. to what extent, does comparative advantage help explain this?arrow_forwardSuppose Jordan is open to free trade in the world market for oranges. Because of Jordan's small size, the demand for and supply of oranges in Jordan do not affect the world price. The following graph shows the domestic oranges market in Jordan. The world price of oranges is Pw = $800 per ton. Throughout this problem, assume that changes in trade policies in other nations do not significantly affect the world market for oranges and that there are no transportation or transaction costs associated with international trade in oranges. Also assume that domestic supplies will satisfy domestic demand as much as possible before any exporting or importing takes place. On the following graph, use the green triangle (triangle symbols) to shade the area representing consumer surplus (CS) when the economy is at the free-trade equilibrium. Then, use the purple triangle (diamond symbols) to shade the area representing domestic producer surplus (PS). PRICE (Dollars per ton) 1280 1220 1160 1100 1040…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education