**Citizens in a growing community** want to build a school that is more convenient for their children to attend. They propose a 1 cent per dollar sales tax increase to pay for the school. They want the proposed sales tax increase to be submitted as a referendum in the upcoming county elections where a majority of yes votes makes the proposal law. A local journalist conducted a survey to see if the proposal will pass if placed on the ballot. She randomly selected 650 voters from the list of registered voters; 364 of these are in favor of the sales tax increase to fund construction of the school.**Which of the following best describes a Type II Error for this hypothesis test?**- Concluding that a majority of voters favor the sales tax increase when they do not.- Concluding that a minority of voters favor the sales tax increase when they do not.- Failing to conclude that a majority of voters favor the sales tax increase when they do.- Failing to conclude that a minority of voters favor the sales tax increase when they do.**Explanation**: A Type II error occurs when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. In this context, it would mean not recognizing that the majority of voters actually support the sales tax increase when in reality they do.

Let p denote the proportion of votes in support of the proposal. Then- vs . A type II error is defined as accepting H0 when H1 is true. Therefore in our case it is best described as: Concluding that majority do not supports the proposal when in reality majority of the voters do support the proposal. (Option A) is correct, by accepting the false null hypothesis. Here the null hypothesis is that proposal will pass.From the given above options OPTION(A) IS CORRECT. THANK U AND PLZZ DO LIKE AND LET US KNOW, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUERY....