Question
Choose three of the following types of damages to fully explain and provide an example of each of the two chosen damages. (Compensatory damages, incidental damages, consequential damages, nominal damages, liquidated damages, punitive damages, or specific performance.)
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Explain What are the key elements required to establish a claim in tort law?arrow_forwardIn employment establishments, an employee may be different from an independent contractor. By reference to case law, explain the tests used by courts to distinguish an employee from an independent contractor.arrow_forwardDamages are the amount allocated to the innocent party in the event of a breach of contract or any negligent acts committed by the defendant. However, one of the most important elements for any plaintiff to be successful is the need to establish that there is a causal relationship between the defendant’s acts and the plaintiff’s injury and loss. Requirements: Define and explain the concept of damages in law. What are the steps that the innocent party need to establish to claim damages? Define and explain the concept of causation and its application to the plaintiff’s quest to get damages. Review the concept of the “but for principle”. You need to review three (3) case laws on this issue. The concept of causation however can be influenced by intervening acts and contributory negligence, which can break the chain of causation. You are required to discuss this matter with 3 supporting case laws. Note. Discuss via a few paragraphs, what was the issue, basic facts and the judgement.…arrow_forward
- What remedies are available to a successful plaintiff in a defamation lawsuit?arrow_forwardis essentially a shortcut for negligence. Instead of having to prove all of the normal elements, a plaintiff would simply have to show that the injury was caused by something in the defendant's exclusive control, the injury generally only occurs in negligence, and the plaintiff was not the cause.arrow_forwardPlease list and describe the 3 types of torts.arrow_forward
- Why do facts matter when it comes to warranties either implied or expressed?arrow_forwardWhich of the following is correct regarding comparative negligence? Comparative negligence is also known as contributory negligence. The harsh rule of comparative negligence is offset by the doctrine of contributory negligence. It increases the plaintiff's damage award by the percentage that the plaintiff contributed to her own harm (due to the plaintiff's own negligence). The plaintiff's contributory negligence does not necessarily bar her recovery of damages from the defendant. It bars the plaintiff from recovery if the plaintiff's own fault contributed to her injuryarrow_forward2) Punitive Damages: Regardless of whether you feel the case was an appropriate one for strict liability, was the McDonald's coffee case an appropriate case for the award of punitive damages? Look over the requirements for punitive damages and assess whether the jury award was appropriate in this case. Why or why not?arrow_forward
- The elements of a negligence tort include which of the following? a. Duty b. Breach of duty c. Proximate causation d. All of the abovearrow_forwardIs there any similarities in the compensatory aims of contract and tort?arrow_forwardDiscuss how a misrepresentation - be it innocent, negligent or fraudulent - is treated under tort law vs. contract law.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios