Changes in productivity can be analysed by looking at how
a. GDP per hour worked is preferable because it eliminates the need to adjust for variations in productivity between employed workers.
b. GDP per employed worker is preferable because the number of employed workers has risen significantly over time.
c. GDP per employed worker is more accurate because the data available on the number of employed workers is more accurate than the data available on the number of hours worked.
d. GDP per hour worked is more accurate because the average number of hours worked per employed worker has changed over time.
e. Both measures are equally good.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
- A typical U.S. worker today works fewer than 40 hours per week, while in 1890, he or she worked 60 hours per week. Does this difference in the length of work weeks matter in comparing the economic well-being of U.S. workers today with that of 1890? Or can we use the difference between real GDP per capita today and in 1890 to measure differ- ences in economic well-being while ignoring differences in the number of hours worked per week? Briefly explain.arrow_forwardSuppose an economy's real GDP is $5,000 billion. There are 125 million workers, each working an average of 2,000 hours per year. a. What is labor productivity per hour in this economy?arrow_forward4. How is GDP per capita calculated differently from labor productivity? 5. How do gains in labor productivity lead to gains in GDP per capita? 6. What is an aggregate production function?arrow_forward
- CALCULATE: Calculate total labor force growth rate in 2022 compared to 2021?arrow_forwardThe following table reports real income per person for several different economies in the years 1960 and 2010. It also gives each economy's average annual growth rate during this period. For example, real income per person in Zambia was $1,412 in 1960, and it actually declined to $1,309 by 2010. Zambia's average annual growth rate during this period was -0.15%, and it was the poorest economy in the table in the year 2010. The real income-per-person figures are denominated in U.S. dollars with a base year of 2005. The following exercises will help you to understand the different growth experiences of these economies. Economy Real Income per Person in 1960 (Dollars) Real Income per Person in 2010 (Dollars) Annual Growth Rate (Percent) Austria 9,773 35,031 2.59 Venezuela 7,307 9,762 0.58 Botswana 468 9,515 6.21 Malaysia 1,624 11,863 4.06 Honduras 1,932 3,146 0.98 Zambia 1,412 1,309 -0.15 Indicate which economy satisfies each of the following…arrow_forwardThe question is in the image.arrow_forward
- Please solve all parts of this questionarrow_forwardLast year real GDP per person in the imaginary nation of Olympus was $4,260. The year before it was $4,100. By about what percentage did real GDP per person grow during the period? a. 1 percent b. 0.04 percent c. 16 percent d. 4 percentarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education