Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781337406659
Author: WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher: Cengage,
Bartleby Related Questions Icon

Related questions

Q: CKO Job Description The CKO is responsible for the development and implementation of an effective…
A: A job description is a written document that lists the obligations, qualifications, and…
Q: Required: i. Briefly outline key action steps you will consider and roll out towards delivering on…
A: In the contemporary business landscape, where environmental consciousness intertwines with fiscal…
Q: ERRANDMATE ANDROID-BASED MARKET APPLICATION  Question: 1. To Identify the current processes…
A: Errandmate android based market application, as people nowadays are not able to do their daily work…
Q: Project Termination Plans for manufacturing electric bus Project placement within a…
A: Project termination plan means checking whether the the company e which ind which was formed to…
Q: Why is earned value management (EVM) underutilised? Explain how it may be used to track spending and…
A: Earned Value Management (EVM) is a powerful technique used in project management to track project…
Q: 1. Executive Summary - a condensed overview of the marketing plan 2. Introduction - Description of…
A: Marketing Plan- Sports organizations has a higher impact on recreational and competitive industry…
Q: The network diagram of a project along with the activity durations (T) are given in the figure. In…
A: A network diagram is the set sequence of the task that is done to complete a project. It usually…
Q: You have recently joined as the project manager of ABC Company. Please refer to the Excel file to…
A: Find the Calculations methods below:
Q: Develop a project network. (b) Develop an activity schedule. Activity Earliest Start Latest Start…
A: Here, each activity is given with description data, immediate predecessor data, and normal time, as…
Q: Describe and identify key stakeholders within the project, and outline your communications plan with…
A: Stakeholders are those with an interest in a project outcome. They are typically the members of a…
Q: The table below contains data for the installation of new equipment in a manufacturing process at…
A: A network diagram is a graphical representation of a project which helps to identify the activity…
Q: 11.1. Three alternative plans for expanding a municipal water distribution system will each meet…
A: We will evaluate each plan using both Present Worth (PW) and Annual Worth (AW) methods to determine…
Q: Topic: Project management  Please read and answer thoroughly    FAO-Funded Aquaponics Project…
A: "The solution has been provided in a generalized Manner." The FAO-Funded Aquaponics Project…
Q: Office Automation Inc., developed a proposal for implementing a software system that will…
A: A network diagram is a graphical representation of a project which helps to identify the activity…
Q: Question 4 When the objectives of a project meet, or exceed, the expectations of its stakeholders,…
A: Stakeholders are individuals or groups who have a vested interest in a project and can affect, or be…
Q: This assignment is a continuation from the Case Study Sign-Up where you will do research on market…
A: BWIT (Beauty World International Trading) is a company specializing in natural perfumes under the…
Q: Office Automation Inc., developed a proposal for implementing a software system that will…
A: NOTE: We are allowed to do first 3 sub-parts only. In project management, a critical path is the…
Q: Why are preliminary estimates prepared?
A: Preliminary estimates: A preliminary estimate is the approximate cost of the project that is…
Q: Good day may I have some help with part D and E in the attached pic
A: Project management refers to the application of knowledge, experience, skills, methods, and…
Question

Discussion Question

 

Cathy Benson, the director of the newly created IT Investment Office, is tasked with the “design and implementation of a detailed investment optimization process to be implemented throughout the bank in time for the next budget cycle.” She has three months to do this, and it must be in accordance with the five established principles to guide the bank’s IT investment process. Your task is to design and implement the following:

  • A thorough and rigorous method of project categorization and prioritization
  • A comprehensive and holistic governance of IT spending and benefits delivery at all levels
  • An annual IT planning process that provides transparency and accountability for all types of IT spending and that creates an integrated and strategically aligned development portfolio

 

MINI CASE: IT Investment at North American Financial ¶ Caroline Weese checked her makeup and then glanced at her watch for the tenth time. Almost 10:45. Showtime. As North American Financial's (NAF) first female CIO, she knew she had to be better than good when she met with the company's senior executives for the first time to justify her IT budget. They had shown their faith in her three months ago by giving her this position, when NAF's long-serving senior vice president of IT had had to retire early due to ill health. But women were just beginning to crack the glass ceiling at the bank, and she knew there was a lot more riding on this presentation than just this budget. That said, the budget situation wasn't great. As she well knew from her earlier experience in more subordinate roles, the CIO had the unenviable task of justifying the company's $500 million budget to a group of executives who only saw the expense of IT, not its value. This was especially frustrating because NAF's IT management was excellent, when looked at by any standard. NAF's IT group consisted of almost 7,000 professionals who followed all the recommended standards such as CMM, CMMI, ISO9001, and ITIL to ensure that its IT processes were efficient, cost effective, and on par with, if not higher than, industry standards. It had been certified at a minimum Level 3- CMMI and was an industry leader in delivering projects on time, on budget, and in scope. But in the past few years, NAF executives had implemented rigorous cost-containment measures for IT, leaving the CIO to struggle to be all things to all people. "They want innovation, they need reliability and stability, and we're required by law to meet ever-more stringent government regulations, but they're still nickel-and-diming us!" Caroline thought indignantly. She envied the bank's business units that could clearly show profit-and-loss statements, and their ability to make strategic decisions about what to do with the excess capital they often had. In her world, business strategies changed regularly, and, thus, IT's goals had to as well. But strategies were not linked to budgets, which were typically set six to nine months in advance. As a result, IT was always struggling to keep up and find the resources to be flexible. She squared her shoulders, took a deep breath, pasted a smile on her face, and pushed open the door to the executive conference room to face her colleagues and her future. The room was full of "suits" a few females here and there, but mostly tough, middle-aged males who expected answers and action. Following a few pleasantries about how she was adjusting to her new role, they got down to business. "The thing we're most concerned about, Caroline," said Bill Harris, NAF's CEO, "is we simply don't see where we're getting value from our IT investments. There's no proof in the bottom line." The CFO added, "Every year we approve hundreds of millions of dollars for IT projects, which are supposedly based on sound cost-benefit analyses, but the benefits never materialize." Heads around the room began nodding. Caroline's mind was whirling. What did they really want from her? Pulling her thoughts together quickly, she responded. "If you're looking for IT to tell you which projects will deliver the most business value, or if you want me to monitor the business units after the projects they asked for are implemented to see if they are delivering value, you're asking me to do something that's well beyond IT's scope of expertise. We're not the experts in your business case, and it shouldn't be up to us to monitor how you use the technology we give you. I'll take full responsibility for the quality of our work, its timely delivery, and its cost, but we really have to work together to ensure we're investing in the right projects and delivering benefits." "What do you recommend then?" asked Sam Patel, head of Retail Banking. "I think we need an IT Investment- Committee that I would co-lead jointly with you, Matt," Caroline said while looking pointedly at the CFO. "We need a strong partnership to explore what can be done and who should be responsible for doing it. Finance is the only place where all the money comes together in this organization. Although I have to pull together an IT budget every year, it's really contingent on what each business unit wants to spend. We don't really have an enterprise IT budgeting process that looks across our business silos to see if what we're spending is good for NAF as a whole. Matt Harper looked thoughtful. "You could be on to something here, Caroline. Let's see if we can figure this out together." The rest of the meeting passed in a blur, and before Caroline knew it, she and Matt were trying to identify who they should assign to help them look at their IT investment challenges. These were significant. First, there was inconsistent alignment of the total IT development budget with enterprise strategies. "We have enterprise strategies but no way of linking them to enterprise spending," Caroline pointed out. IT budgets were allocated according to the size of the business unit. Smaller lines of business had smaller IT budgets than larger ones. "For some small business units like ours, government mandatory projects eat up our entire IT budget," complained Cathy Benson, senior vice president of Business Banking Product Management. This made it extremely difficult to allocate IT. resources strategically- say, for example, to grow a smaller business unit into a larger one.
expand button
Transcribed Image Text:MINI CASE: IT Investment at North American Financial ¶ Caroline Weese checked her makeup and then glanced at her watch for the tenth time. Almost 10:45. Showtime. As North American Financial's (NAF) first female CIO, she knew she had to be better than good when she met with the company's senior executives for the first time to justify her IT budget. They had shown their faith in her three months ago by giving her this position, when NAF's long-serving senior vice president of IT had had to retire early due to ill health. But women were just beginning to crack the glass ceiling at the bank, and she knew there was a lot more riding on this presentation than just this budget. That said, the budget situation wasn't great. As she well knew from her earlier experience in more subordinate roles, the CIO had the unenviable task of justifying the company's $500 million budget to a group of executives who only saw the expense of IT, not its value. This was especially frustrating because NAF's IT management was excellent, when looked at by any standard. NAF's IT group consisted of almost 7,000 professionals who followed all the recommended standards such as CMM, CMMI, ISO9001, and ITIL to ensure that its IT processes were efficient, cost effective, and on par with, if not higher than, industry standards. It had been certified at a minimum Level 3- CMMI and was an industry leader in delivering projects on time, on budget, and in scope. But in the past few years, NAF executives had implemented rigorous cost-containment measures for IT, leaving the CIO to struggle to be all things to all people. "They want innovation, they need reliability and stability, and we're required by law to meet ever-more stringent government regulations, but they're still nickel-and-diming us!" Caroline thought indignantly. She envied the bank's business units that could clearly show profit-and-loss statements, and their ability to make strategic decisions about what to do with the excess capital they often had. In her world, business strategies changed regularly, and, thus, IT's goals had to as well. But strategies were not linked to budgets, which were typically set six to nine months in advance. As a result, IT was always struggling to keep up and find the resources to be flexible. She squared her shoulders, took a deep breath, pasted a smile on her face, and pushed open the door to the executive conference room to face her colleagues and her future. The room was full of "suits" a few females here and there, but mostly tough, middle-aged males who expected answers and action. Following a few pleasantries about how she was adjusting to her new role, they got down to business. "The thing we're most concerned about, Caroline," said Bill Harris, NAF's CEO, "is we simply don't see where we're getting value from our IT investments. There's no proof in the bottom line." The CFO added, "Every year we approve hundreds of millions of dollars for IT projects, which are supposedly based on sound cost-benefit analyses, but the benefits never materialize." Heads around the room began nodding. Caroline's mind was whirling. What did they really want from her? Pulling her thoughts together quickly, she responded. "If you're looking for IT to tell you which projects will deliver the most business value, or if you want me to monitor the business units after the projects they asked for are implemented to see if they are delivering value, you're asking me to do something that's well beyond IT's scope of expertise. We're not the experts in your business case, and it shouldn't be up to us to monitor how you use the technology we give you. I'll take full responsibility for the quality of our work, its timely delivery, and its cost, but we really have to work together to ensure we're investing in the right projects and delivering benefits." "What do you recommend then?" asked Sam Patel, head of Retail Banking. "I think we need an IT Investment- Committee that I would co-lead jointly with you, Matt," Caroline said while looking pointedly at the CFO. "We need a strong partnership to explore what can be done and who should be responsible for doing it. Finance is the only place where all the money comes together in this organization. Although I have to pull together an IT budget every year, it's really contingent on what each business unit wants to spend. We don't really have an enterprise IT budgeting process that looks across our business silos to see if what we're spending is good for NAF as a whole. Matt Harper looked thoughtful. "You could be on to something here, Caroline. Let's see if we can figure this out together." The rest of the meeting passed in a blur, and before Caroline knew it, she and Matt were trying to identify who they should assign to help them look at their IT investment challenges. These were significant. First, there was inconsistent alignment of the total IT development budget with enterprise strategies. "We have enterprise strategies but no way of linking them to enterprise spending," Caroline pointed out. IT budgets were allocated according to the size of the business unit. Smaller lines of business had smaller IT budgets than larger ones. "For some small business units like ours, government mandatory projects eat up our entire IT budget," complained Cathy Benson, senior vice president of Business Banking Product Management. This made it extremely difficult to allocate IT. resources strategically- say, for example, to grow a smaller business unit into a larger one.
Second, project approvals were made by business units without addressing cross-unit synergies. Looking at the projects IT had under way revealed that the company had eighteen separate projects in different parts of the business to comply with anti-money laundering regulations. "We've got to be reinventing the wheel with some of these," complained Ian Ha, senior director of NAF's Risk and Compliance department. Third, although business cases were required for all major projects, their formats were inconsistent, and the data provided to justify the costs lacked rigor. "There seems to be a lot of gaming going on here," observed Michael Cranston, director of Financial Strategy. "A lot of these numbers don't make sense. How come we've never asked the business sponsors of these projects to take ownership for the business benefits they claim when they ask for the money in the first place?" Fourth, once a project was approved, everyone focused on on-time, on-budget delivery. No one ever asked whether a project was still necessary or was still on track to deliver the benefits anticipated. "Do we ever stop projects once they've started or review the business case 'in-flight'?" mused Matt. Finally, no one appeared to be accountable for delivering these benefits once an IT project was developed and implemented; rather, everyone just heaved a great- sigh of relief and moved on to the next project. Because the total IT budget for new development work was allocated by business unit, the result was a prioritization process that worked reasonably well at the business unit level but not for NAF as a whole. Enterprise executives created enterprise strategies, but they didn't get involved in implementing them in the business units, which left the business unit heads to prioritize initiatives within their own silo. In prioritization meetings, leaders would argue passionately for their own particular cause and focusing on their own needs, not on NAF's overall strategies. "We really need to align this process with our enterprise priorities," said Caroline. Matt agreed. "There's got to be a process to bring all our investment decisions for new projects together so we can compare them across business- units and adjust our resourcing accordingly." Looking deeper into these matters revealed that there was more to IT spending than simply prioritizing projects, however. Almost 60% of the bank's IT budget was spent not on strategic new development projects but on maintaining existing systems, interfaces, and data. And another 20% was work that had to be done to meet the demands of government legislation or the bank's regulators. "How is this possible?" asked Sam. "No wonder we're not getting much bang for our buck!" Caroline exclaimed. "Every time we develop or acquire a new system without getting rid of something else, we add to our application clutter. When we continually add new systems while holding IT budgets and head counts relatively flat, more and more of our resources have to be devoted to supporting these systems." New systems meant new interfaces between and among existing systems, additional data and dependencies, and increasing risk that something could go wrong. "We've tried to get the business units interested in sponsoring an initiative to reduce duplication and simplify our applications portfolio, but they're not interested in what they call IT housekeeping. They don't see how dealing with this will help them in the long run. I guess we haven't explained it to them very well." Brenda Liu, senior director of IT Infrastructure, added, "We also have to keep our IT environment up to date.. Vendors are continually making upgrades to software, and there are also license fees to consider. And, as you know, we have to build in extra reliability and redundancy for our critical systems and data, as well as privacy protection for our banking customers. It's an expensive process." "I get all this," said Benson, "but why can't you explain it to us properly? How can you just expect us to accept that 80% of your budget is a black box' that doesn't need justification? Although every dime you spend may be critical to this company, the fact remains that IT's lack of transparency is damaging its internal credibility with the business." Round and round the issues they went. Over the next two months, Caroline, Matt, and their team hammered away at them. Eventually, they came up with a set of five principles on which their new IT investment process would be based: 1. Alignment of the IT development portfolio with enterprise strategies 2. Rigor and common standards around IT planning and business casing 3. Accountability in both business and IT for delivering value 4. Transparency at all levels and stages of development 5. Collaboration and cross-group synergies in all IT work In their team update to the bank's executive committee, Caroline and Matt wrote, "Our vision is for a holistic view of our IT spending that will allow us to direct our resources where they will have the greatest impact. We propose to increase rigor and discipline in business casing and benefits tracking so NAF can invest with confidence in IT. The result will be strategic partnerships between IT and business units based on trust, leading us to surprise and delight our customers and employees and amaze our competitors." With the executive committee's blessing, the IT Investment Office was created to design and implement a detailed investment optimization process that could be implemented throughout the bank in time for the next budget cycle.
expand button
Transcribed Image Text:Second, project approvals were made by business units without addressing cross-unit synergies. Looking at the projects IT had under way revealed that the company had eighteen separate projects in different parts of the business to comply with anti-money laundering regulations. "We've got to be reinventing the wheel with some of these," complained Ian Ha, senior director of NAF's Risk and Compliance department. Third, although business cases were required for all major projects, their formats were inconsistent, and the data provided to justify the costs lacked rigor. "There seems to be a lot of gaming going on here," observed Michael Cranston, director of Financial Strategy. "A lot of these numbers don't make sense. How come we've never asked the business sponsors of these projects to take ownership for the business benefits they claim when they ask for the money in the first place?" Fourth, once a project was approved, everyone focused on on-time, on-budget delivery. No one ever asked whether a project was still necessary or was still on track to deliver the benefits anticipated. "Do we ever stop projects once they've started or review the business case 'in-flight'?" mused Matt. Finally, no one appeared to be accountable for delivering these benefits once an IT project was developed and implemented; rather, everyone just heaved a great- sigh of relief and moved on to the next project. Because the total IT budget for new development work was allocated by business unit, the result was a prioritization process that worked reasonably well at the business unit level but not for NAF as a whole. Enterprise executives created enterprise strategies, but they didn't get involved in implementing them in the business units, which left the business unit heads to prioritize initiatives within their own silo. In prioritization meetings, leaders would argue passionately for their own particular cause and focusing on their own needs, not on NAF's overall strategies. "We really need to align this process with our enterprise priorities," said Caroline. Matt agreed. "There's got to be a process to bring all our investment decisions for new projects together so we can compare them across business- units and adjust our resourcing accordingly." Looking deeper into these matters revealed that there was more to IT spending than simply prioritizing projects, however. Almost 60% of the bank's IT budget was spent not on strategic new development projects but on maintaining existing systems, interfaces, and data. And another 20% was work that had to be done to meet the demands of government legislation or the bank's regulators. "How is this possible?" asked Sam. "No wonder we're not getting much bang for our buck!" Caroline exclaimed. "Every time we develop or acquire a new system without getting rid of something else, we add to our application clutter. When we continually add new systems while holding IT budgets and head counts relatively flat, more and more of our resources have to be devoted to supporting these systems." New systems meant new interfaces between and among existing systems, additional data and dependencies, and increasing risk that something could go wrong. "We've tried to get the business units interested in sponsoring an initiative to reduce duplication and simplify our applications portfolio, but they're not interested in what they call IT housekeeping. They don't see how dealing with this will help them in the long run. I guess we haven't explained it to them very well." Brenda Liu, senior director of IT Infrastructure, added, "We also have to keep our IT environment up to date.. Vendors are continually making upgrades to software, and there are also license fees to consider. And, as you know, we have to build in extra reliability and redundancy for our critical systems and data, as well as privacy protection for our banking customers. It's an expensive process." "I get all this," said Benson, "but why can't you explain it to us properly? How can you just expect us to accept that 80% of your budget is a black box' that doesn't need justification? Although every dime you spend may be critical to this company, the fact remains that IT's lack of transparency is damaging its internal credibility with the business." Round and round the issues they went. Over the next two months, Caroline, Matt, and their team hammered away at them. Eventually, they came up with a set of five principles on which their new IT investment process would be based: 1. Alignment of the IT development portfolio with enterprise strategies 2. Rigor and common standards around IT planning and business casing 3. Accountability in both business and IT for delivering value 4. Transparency at all levels and stages of development 5. Collaboration and cross-group synergies in all IT work In their team update to the bank's executive committee, Caroline and Matt wrote, "Our vision is for a holistic view of our IT spending that will allow us to direct our resources where they will have the greatest impact. We propose to increase rigor and discipline in business casing and benefits tracking so NAF can invest with confidence in IT. The result will be strategic partnerships between IT and business units based on trust, leading us to surprise and delight our customers and employees and amaze our competitors." With the executive committee's blessing, the IT Investment Office was created to design and implement a detailed investment optimization process that could be implemented throughout the bank in time for the next budget cycle.
Expert Solution
Check Mark
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
bartleby
This is a popular solution
See solutionCheck out a sample Q&A here
Step 1: SUMMARY-
VIEW
Step 2: Below is the task designed and implemented-
VIEW
Solution
VIEW
bartleby

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

bartleby

Step by stepSolved in 3 steps

See solution
Check out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781259667473
Author:William J Stevenson
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi...
Operations Management
ISBN:9781259666100
Author:F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:9780135198100
Author:BOVEE
Publisher:PEARSON CO
Text book image
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi...
Operations Management
ISBN:9781478623069
Author:Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:Waveland Press, Inc.
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS