Carpet Baggers, Inc., is proposing to construct a new bagging plant in a country in Europe. The two prime candidates are Germany and Switzerland. The forecasted cash flows from the proposed plants are as follows:     C0 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 IRR(%) Germany (millions of euros) –75 +25 +30 +30 +35 +35 +35 32.6 Switzerland (millions of Swiss francs) –131 +35 +45 +45 +46 +46 +46 23.3     The spot exchange rate for euros is $1.45/€, while the rate for Swiss francs is SFr1.65/$. The interest rate is 4% in the United States, 3% in Switzerland, and 5% in the euro countries. The financial manager has suggested that, if the cash flows were stated in dollars, a return in excess of 10% would be acceptable.   a. Calculate the NPV in dollars for the German plant. (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer in millions rounded to 2 decimal places.

I just need B. It is not 16.93.

Please correct answer and don't use hand rating

Carpet Baggers Inc. is proposing to construct a new bagging plant in a country in Europe. The two prime candidates are Germany and Switzerland. The forecasted cash flows from the proposed plants are as follows: The table is attached as Added Image. please be detailed in your explantions. Thank you The spot exchange rate for euros is $1.3/€, while the rate for Swiss francs is CHF 1.5/$. The interest rate is 5% in the United States, 4% in Switzerland, and 6% in the euro countries. The financial manager has suggested that, if the cash flows were stated in dollars, a return in excess of 10% would be acceptable.  *Should the company go ahead with either project? If it must choose between them, which should it take? Justify your answer.

arpet Baggers Inc. is proposing to construct a new bagging plant in a country in Europe. The two prime candidates are Germany and Switzerland. The forecasted cash flows from the proposed plants are as follows:     The spot exchange rate for euros is $1.3/€, while the rate for Swiss francs is CHF 1.5/$. The interest rate is 5% in the United States, 4% in Switzerland, and 6% in the euro countries. The financial manager has suggested that, if the cash flows were stated in dollars, a return in excess of 10% would be acceptable.    Should the company go ahead with either project? What is the NPV of the projects? If it must choose between them, which should it take?  The table is attached to this question. Be comprehensive when Justifying your answer. Thank you.

The US based company is investing in a 2-year project in Europe. The initial investment is €10,000. The expected cash inflow in the year one is €6,000 and in the year two is €8,000. The risk-free rate in US is 3% and Europe 2%. If the spot rate is $1.25/€ and the required rate of return of the project is 14%, calculate the NPV of the project in dollars. (A) The NPV of the project in dollars is $1,773.62. (B) The NPV of the project in dollars is $1.704.32. (C) The NPV of the project in dollars is $1,418.90. (D)The NPV of the project in dollars is $1,989,74

A project in Japan will generate 130M Yen per year forever. Sunrise Corp. is a US firm that is considering investing in that project in Japan. The current risk-free rate in US is 7% and the risk-free rate in Japan is 5%. The approproate cost of capital for a US-based project of similar risk is 15.8%. What is the cost of capital if you are using the foreign currency approach? 17.8% 8.8% 20.8%

"The par-ent of Nester Co. (a U.S. firm) has no international business but plans to invest $20 million in a business in Switzerland. Because the operating costs of this business are very low, Nester Co. expects this business to generate large cash flows in Swiss francs that will be remitted to the parent each year. Nester will finance half of this project with debt. It has these choices for financing the project: ■obtain half of the funds needed from parent equityand the other half by borrowing dollars, ■obtain half of the funds needed from parent equity and the other half by borrowing Swiss francs, or ■obtain half of the funds that are needed from parent equity and obtain the remainder by borrowing an equal amount of dollars and Swiss francs.The interest rate on dollars is the same as the interest rate on Swiss francs. a. Which choice will result in the most exchange rate exposure? b. Which choice will result in the least exchange rate exposure? c. If the Swiss franc were expected to…

A French company is considering a project in US. The project will cost $100M. The cash flows are expected to be $30M per year for 5 years. The current spot exchange rate is $1.20/ . The risk-free rate in the US is 1%, and the risk-free rate in Europe is 2%. The dollar required return on the project is 12%. Find the NPV in home currency using home currency approach.   Correct answer is $7.1 million   Please answer urgently will upvote

Micheal’s Machinery is a German multinational manufacturing company. Currently, Micheal’s financial planners are considering undertaking a 1-year project in the United States. The project's expected dollar-denominated cash flows consist of an initial investment of $2000 and a cash inflow the following year of $2400. Micheal’s estimates that its risk-adjusted cost of capital is 12%. Currently, 1 U.S. dollar will buy 0.7 Germany. In addition, 1-year risk-free securities in the United States are yielding 6.5%, while similar securities in Germany’s are yielding 4.5%. If this project was instead undertaken by a similar U.S.-based company with the same risk-adjusted cost of capital, what would be the net present value and rate of return generated by this project? Round your answers to two decimal places. What is the expected forward exchange rate 1 year from now? Round your answer to two decimal places. If Micheal undertakes the project, what is the net present value and rate of return of…