Carl, a credit officer for U Bank, evaluates and approves extensions of credit to bank clients. He has access to nonpublic information about clients' earnings, performance, acquisitions, and business plans. U Bank caters to a very wealthy clientele and Carl frequently travels to meet potential clients for lunch dates at fancy restaurants.
Carl contracts privately with Rubin, an independent accountant, to sell securities based on bank client information. Rubin believes Carl is very smart and has a "nose for business."
Rubin trades securities of more than 10 different companies and both men profited more than $5 million over five years.
On the way to a business meeting with a potential new bank client, Carl stops at Rubin's house to discuss business dealings and have a few drinks. Carl leaves Rubin's house drunk and is killed when his car strikes a tree. Carl's family sues U Bank for Carl's death.
Rubin, discovering the investment scheme perpetrated by Carl, sues U Bank when he is arrested for violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
- Under what agency law doctrine might the bank be liable for Carl's death and what is the key factor for making this determination?
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
- Freida, who lives in Covington, Louisiana purchased three bonds from a company based in Brazil that were yielding 9.75% and paid a 12% coupon, semi-annually. The company went bankrupt and Freida never received her money. What type of risk caused Freida's loss? Interest rate risk. Default risk. Exchange rate risk. Executive risk.arrow_forwardAfter researching Best Buy common stock, Sally Wang is convinced the stock is overpriced. She contacts her account executive and arranges to sell short 550 shares of Best Buy. At the time of the sale, a share of common stock had a value of $148. Three months later, Best Buy is selling for $140 a share, and Sally instructs her broker to cover her short transaction. Total commissions to buy and sell the stock were $58. What is her profit for this short transaction?arrow_forwardCompanies A and B differ only in their capital structure. A is financed 30% debt and 70% equity: B is financed 10% debt and 90% equity. The debt of both companies is risk-free. a. Rosencrantz owns 1% of the common stock of A. What other investment package would produce identical cash flow for Rosencrantz? b. Guildenstern owns 2% of common stock of B. What other investment package would produce identical cash flows for Guildenstern?arrow_forward
- 4. Explain how the existence of a lender of last resort might prevent bank runs.arrow_forwardHow does the debt instruments different to debt securities?arrow_forward4.Bryson issues a $5,000 negotiable check "payable to the order of Yolanda or cash." Yolanda places her signature on the back of the check. Yolanda then negotiates the check to Casey. Given these facts, which of the following is generally correct? а. The check was issued as a bearer instrument and Yolanda could not have converted it into an order instrument. b. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is not required in order for Casey to qualify or assert that he is a holder in due course. С. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is generally referred to as a special indorsement. d. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is required in order for Casey to qualify or assert that he is a holder in due course.arrow_forward
- Danny is furious when he discovers that his car has been repossessed by Sakan Finance in his absence, eventhough he did receive a repossession notice in his mailbox. Discuss whether Sakan Finance is entitled to act in such a manner. I need Only typing answerarrow_forwardOn March 3rd 2009, the Fraud Examination Team, a department of the Bureau of Fraud Examination, received a call from Anton Valukas, chairman of the Chicago law firm Jenner & Block LLP. In early 2009, a bankruptcy court in New York assigned Valukas to investigate and report on the causes of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc (LBHI)[1]’s 2008 bankruptcy. During this investigation, Valukas came across “Repo 105” and “Repo 108” transactions that Lehman used from 2001 to 2008. A “repo” or repurchase agreement is a form of short-term borrowing, whereby one party agrees to temporarily “sell” securities to another party at a specified price, while also committing to repurchase them at a future date, and at a usually higher preset price by the same buyer. While “repo” transactions are legal and are frequently used by investment banks as a means of obtaining short-term financing, Valukas stated that given the period of the fiscal year when these transactions were mostly conducted, as well as how…arrow_forwardCommercial papers are also called monetary instruments. False Truearrow_forward
- Read and analyze the following situation.Bernard J. Ebbers, chief executive officer and founder of the telecommunications giant, WorldCom, owed the corporation $375 million for a loan secured by shares he owned in the company. The value of the company's stock was declining, to the point that the value of its shares was less than the amount of the loan. On February 2, 2002, Mr. Ebbers engaged in a series of communications with leading Wall Street stock analysts, whose opinions helped drive up the stock price, to refute negative news about the company's financial condition. , which was frightening investors. That day, the company's shares increased by 12% in value. Four months later, the company filed for bankruptcy protection due to its precarious economic condition. Answer the following questions:Are the actions mentioned above illegal? Are they unethical? Support and explain your answer. What is the difference between an illegal action and an unethical one? Support and explain your…arrow_forwardHyde is a broker involved in a conflicting demands settlement procedure that has already begun. The escrow funds are held in an attorney's escrow account. Hyde seeks an EDO from the FREC. How will the FREC likely respond? The FREC will not issue an EDO because the funds are in an attorney's escrow account. The FREC will issue an EDO within ten business days. The FREC will issue an EDO if the other three settlement procedures don't work. The FREC will not issue an EDO because the dispute must be settledarrow_forwardDiscuss the role of securities law in regulating the issuance and trading of stocks and bonds, as well as the legal obligations of companies in providing accurate and timely financial information to investors.arrow_forward