Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
Psychology
Can you expalin the 3 Approaches to Interculture Communication that is easier to understand?

Can you expalin the 3 Approaches to Interculture Communication that is easier to understand?

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
5th Edition
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1TY
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question

Can you expalin the 3 Approaches to Interculture Communication that is easier to understand?

 

INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION 150 better understand the concept of intercultural communication, three approaches as explained by Martin and To Nakayama (2010) can be studied: whoslano ba libing to paisaitemeianu-galbasobnuzun botelor ogeigne l Three Approaches to Intercultural Communication Discipline on which approach is founded Research goal Assumption of reality Method of study Ronn Social Science or Functionalist Interpretative Anthropology, Various bas sociolinguistics 190 as covkamisili digisinaq oth yd soubor Describe qibit Change behavior boy behavior Subjective Contribution of the approach Psychology 2mut Assumptions of Predictable Creative and human behavior voluntary Describe and predict behavior External and describable Survey, observation Lewaluasini bass Relationship Communication of culture and influenced by communication culture e bus Juod Identifies cultural variations; recognizes cultural Participant observation, hand ibnslio bloy also nouton differences in atto houbibrante many aspects of muitos Joy hnet Textual analysis of media field study on saadı el yr W Culture as a site of power struggle Culture created maintained through communication of Emphasizes that od or bas communication and culturalim and culture differences Critical Subjective and material Changeable q 1801 Recognizes the economic and political forces in culture and tum qu communication; asserts that all intercultural b interactions are sualus odio, ging on the toy indi characterized by power ban How would you compare the approaches in the table above in wa dni di vino ei terms of human nature, human behavior, and nature of knowledge emphasized? Do you think each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses? What do you think are its advantages? What are the disadvantages or limitations of each? communication should be but often does studied in not consider wani context oique squilus on context ori al sigose
Transcribed Image Text:INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION 150 better understand the concept of intercultural communication, three approaches as explained by Martin and To Nakayama (2010) can be studied: whoslano ba libing to paisaitemeianu-galbasobnuzun botelor ogeigne l Three Approaches to Intercultural Communication Discipline on which approach is founded Research goal Assumption of reality Method of study Ronn Social Science or Functionalist Interpretative Anthropology, Various bas sociolinguistics 190 as covkamisili digisinaq oth yd soubor Describe qibit Change behavior boy behavior Subjective Contribution of the approach Psychology 2mut Assumptions of Predictable Creative and human behavior voluntary Describe and predict behavior External and describable Survey, observation Lewaluasini bass Relationship Communication of culture and influenced by communication culture e bus Juod Identifies cultural variations; recognizes cultural Participant observation, hand ibnslio bloy also nouton differences in atto houbibrante many aspects of muitos Joy hnet Textual analysis of media field study on saadı el yr W Culture as a site of power struggle Culture created maintained through communication of Emphasizes that od or bas communication and culturalim and culture differences Critical Subjective and material Changeable q 1801 Recognizes the economic and political forces in culture and tum qu communication; asserts that all intercultural b interactions are sualus odio, ging on the toy indi characterized by power ban How would you compare the approaches in the table above in wa dni di vino ei terms of human nature, human behavior, and nature of knowledge emphasized? Do you think each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses? What do you think are its advantages? What are the disadvantages or limitations of each? communication should be but often does studied in not consider wani context oique squilus on context ori al sigose
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780134477961
Author:
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:
PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337408271
Author:
Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337565691
Author:
Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780393265156
Author:
Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Psychology
ISBN:
9781285763880
Author:
E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:
9781305652958
Author:
Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS