Can a negotiable instrument be endorsed in blank? What are the consequences of such an endorsement?

In relation to Consideration select the CORRECT statement:Select one:To be valid, the agreed price and the goods sold, must be of equal value.Consideration can be vague or illusory as long as it was communicated to the other partyConsideration is the exchange of something of value (a thing, a promise, money etc), given in return for something else of value (a thing, a promise, money etc)Consideration is not necessary to form a legally binding contractTo be valid, Consideration must involve payment of money, in return for something of value.

A rented a car owned by B for 50$ going to Seoul. Under the condition the A will cover the expenses for gasoline and will return the car after 18 hours. When A was already in Seoul, A parked the car in the park. The car was lost. The car is 700$ worth. What are A's obligations now under the concept of simple loan or mutuum? Will A just pay 50$ or 700$ to B?Explain. What should be the responsibility of A in relation to the lost rented-vehicle?

You've read about the statute of frauds and how it requires certain agreements to be in writing (remember the acronym MYLEGS). Thinking about all contracts, do you think that all contracts should be in writing? Or do you think this would hinder or slow down transactions?  Please discuss your thoughts on these questions while keeping in mind the purpose behind the statute of frauds.

Hyde is a broker involved in a conflicting demands settlement procedure that has already begun. The escrow funds are held in an attorney's escrow account. Hyde seeks an EDO from the FREC. How will the FREC likely respond? The FREC will not issue an EDO because the funds are in an attorney's escrow account. The FREC will issue an EDO within ten business days. The FREC will issue an EDO if the other three settlement procedures don't work. The FREC will not issue an EDO because the dispute must be settled

If a person signs a negotiable instrument because he is fraudulently deceived regarding its nature or essential terms gives the holder a universal defense.. O True False

This case describes a hypothetical situation faced by a fictitious international conglomerate, ICL, that intends to enter the retail grocery market in Hong Kong. The conglomerate's interest in the Hong Kong supermarket industry was initially kindled by the plan of Hutchison Whampoa, Ltd. (HWL) to sell its leading supermarket chain PARKnSHOP in August 2013. However, in October 2013, HWL reversed course and decided not to sell PARKnSHOP, saying that the sale would not deliver maximum value to its shareholders. Before embarking into new territory, ICL wanted an in-depth understanding of the Hong Kong grocery market environment, competitors, and potential barriers to entry. The conglomerate was aware that the new Competition Law, which was expected to take effect in 2015, might have profound implications on the grocery market landscape in Hong Kong. Case Study Questions Analyze the competitive environment of the supermarket industry in Hong Kong and the competitive response of the two…

Pick the right option   What is the term the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) gives to a person who seeks to enforce a negotiable instrument that is lost, stolen, or destroyed?   -Beneficiary -Non-holder

–Said is the owner of a shop. He places a notice on the window advertising the sale of batteries at half price. What kind of notice? You should provide in your answer: 1- What kind of contract 2- Legal or not 3- Express or implied or Quasi 4- Unilateral or Bilateral 5- Your reflection and comments

explain the following terms in your own words and understanding and give specific examples. - Obligations - Contracts - Law - Quasi-Contracts -  Quasi-Delicts