Assuming the requirements are met for the anchovies study and using a significance level of 10%, the researcher wants to test the claim that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20-30) who dislike anchovies. What is the correct conclusion for this hypothesis test? O As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies.

Assuming the requirements are met for the anchovies study and using a significance level of 10%, the researcher wants to test the claim that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20-30) who dislike anchovies. What is the correct conclusion for this hypothesis test? O As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is less than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is less than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is greater than a, we reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies. O As the P-value is greater than a, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Thus, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of teenagers (ages 13-19) who dislike anchovies is different than the proportion of young adults (ages 20- 30) who dislike anchovies.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8SGR

See similar textbooks