Assume we are using regularized logistic regression for binary classification. Assume you have observed very large errors with its predictions on the new (unseen) data point, while the model has a low error on training data. Which of the following are steps would help to reduce the error on unseen data? Check all that apply. Use fewer training examples. Try adding polynomial features. O Try using a smaller set of features. Get more training examples.

Assume we are using regularized logistic regression for binary classification. Assume you have observed very large errors with its predictions on the new (unseen) data point, while the model has a low error on training data. Which of the following are steps would help to reduce the error on unseen data? Check all that apply. Use fewer training examples. Try adding polynomial features. O Try using a smaller set of features. Get more training examples.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Analysts at a start-up company are analyzing 35 months of sales data. They partition the data (the first 20 observations are assigned to the training set; the most recent 15 months are in the test set). The only independent variable is T (month number, ranging from 1 to 35). Five models (polynomials of order 1 - 5) are fit to the data. The first order is just the linear model; the 2nd order polynomial is the quadratic model; order 3 is the cubic model, etc. In each case the model is fit on the training data, and scored on both the training and test data sets. The results are below. Based on this output, which is the best predictive model? Metrics AE RMSE MAE SSE Metrics AE RMSE MAE SSE Model 2 Model 3 Model 5 Model 4 Model 1 1 <0.000001 0.955978 0.792802 18.277907 1 -1.034550 1.424155 1.208991 30.423248 Training Data Scoring Models (Polynomial of order 1-5) 4 2 <0.000001 0.928791 0.759583 17.253086 3 <0.000001 <0.000001 0.928295 0.855568 0.761951 0.652212 17.234646 14.639962 Test Data…
Using either descriptive or prescriptive models is preferable, but which is better?
You are working on a spam classification system using regularized logistic regression. "Spam" is a positive class (y = 1)and "not spam" is the negative class (y=0). You have trained your classifier and there are m= 1000 examples in the cross-validation set. The chart of predicted class vs. actual class is: Predicted class: 1 Predicted class: 0 Actual class: 1 85 15 For reference: Accuracy = (true positives + true negatives)/(total examples) Precision = (true positives)/(true positives + false positives) Recall = (true positives)/ (true positives + false negatives) F1 score = (2* precision * recall)/(precision + recall) What is the classifier's F1 score (as a value from 0 to 1)? Write all steps Use the editor to format your answer Actual class: 0 890 10
Give a concise description of model calibration as an iterative process and provide an example.
Plot following curves in the SAME figure where x-axis is "Model Complexity" and y-axis is the value: (1) Bias; (2) Variance; (3) Training Accuracy; (4) Testing Accuracy; [Paste your plot here]
Assume the following simple regression model, Y = β0 + β1X + ϵ ϵ ∼ N(0, σ^2 ) Now run the following R-code to generate values of σ^2 = sig2, β1 = beta1 and β0 = beta0. Simulate the parameters using the following codes: Code: # Simulation ## set.seed("12345") beta0 <- rnorm(1, mean = 0, sd = 1) ## The true beta0 beta1 <- runif(n = 1, min = 1, max = 3) ## The true beta1 sig2 <- rchisq(n = 1, df = 25) ## The true value of the error variance sigmaˆ2 ## Multiple simulation will require loops ## nsample <- 10 ## Sample size n.sim <- 100 ## The number of simulations sigX <- 0.2 ## The variances of X # # Simulate the predictor variable ## X <- rnorm(nsample, mean = 0, sd = sqrt(sigX)) Q1 Fix the sample size nsample = 10 . Here, the values of X are fixed. You just need to generate ϵ and Y . Execute 100 simulations (i.e., n.sim = 100). For each simulation, estimate the regression coefficients (β0, β1) and the error variance (σ 2 ). Calculate the mean of…
Given a dataset with 100 attributes, is it true that the classification performance is more accurate on the testing dataset if we use more attributes to split the dataset and why? Please propose two methods to restrict the decision tree models in order to avoid overfitting.
Assume that we have a data set of 5,000 labelled examples. If you partition it into training and test data using 5-fold cross-validation, then answer the following questions: how many data examples are contained in each test set?
You have a dataset that contains some patient medical records. This dataset is messy, full of incomplete/missing and erroneous data. Your task is to build a classification model on these records but you are concerned about the quality of the data handed to you. After consulting your colleagues you get an advice to chain two models: 1. the first model will de-noise the data and transform it into a better and complete representation of itself 2. the second model will take the output of the first model and classify the data What type of artificial neural network would you consider for your first model? Group of answer choices Autoencoder Convolutional neural network (CNN) Generative adversarial network (GAN) Multi-layer perceptron (MLP) Recurrent neural network (RNN)
All-subsets regression outperforms stepwise regression when it comes to data analysis.