Assume an individual spends all of the their income on a bundle comprised of good #1 and good #2. In particular, their utility function is given by: U(q1,q2) = q12/3q21/3 Assume the price of good #1 is $1 (p1=1) and the price of good #2 is $3 (p2=3). What must the individual's income be if they maximize their utility by purchasing 10 units of good #1?

Kai spends his income on lime (L) and ginger water (G). Lime is priced at $2, while ginger water costs $1. Suppose Kai has $30 to spend and his utility function can be represented as U(L,G) = L0.5 G0.5 What is the optimal number of lime and ginger water for Kai to purchase? b. How much utility does this combination bring him?

Suppose that a consumer has the utility function U(X,Y)= 2X 1/2 y 1/2 for X>0 and Y> 0. Which of the following utility functions would not represent the same preferences? U(X,Y)= 2(X + Y) 1/2 U(X,Y)=2x1/2y 1/2 - 100 O U(X,Y)= In 2 + InX+ In Y O U(X,Y)= X 1/2 y 1/2 O U(X, Y) = 4XY

A consumer with $120 income and the utility function u(x,y) = (x^2)y where x is food and y clothing can go for shopping in one of the two stores A or B, where the prices for food and clothing are respectively pAx = 1, PAy = 80 and PBx = 8, PBy = 1. (a) If she can visit only one of the stores, which one would she go and what would be her optimal bundle there? Could she afford this very bundle at the other store? (HINT: How happy would she be if she chooses to go to store A for shopping? To store B? Which one is higher and what bundle would she buy there?) (b) If she can freely visit both stores (so that she buys each good from the store where it is sold cheaper), what would be her optimal bundle? What would she buy from each store? (c) How much money would she be willing to give up (out of her $120 budget) for the ability to visit both stores as in (b) rather than being restricted to shopping in only one store (the one she chooses in (a)? (HINT: suppose she pays $A for this privilege.…