Assume a relation schema R(a, b, c, d, e, f) with primary key (a, b) and the following full func- tional dependencies: d→ f {a,b} → d {a,b} → f a c b→ e Write down the result of normalizing R into 3rd normal form (no explanations needed). Declare primary and foreign keys in the resulting schemas. ..urvel: [

Assume a relation schema R(a, b, c, d, e, f) with primary key (a, b) and the following full func- tional dependencies: d→ f {a,b} → d {a,b} → f a c b→ e Write down the result of normalizing R into 3rd normal form (no explanations needed). Declare primary and foreign keys in the resulting schemas. ..urvel: [

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the relation scheme R = {A, B, C, D, E, G} and the set of functional dependencies for the relation R are F = {AB → C, AC → B, ABD → E, D → B, BC → A, E → G}. %3D a) Find all candidate keys of F. b) Find a 3NF decomposition for R that is lossless and dependency preserving.
Given the reation R (A, B, C, D , E), with functional dependencies: A, B -> C D, E -> C B -> D Could you explain why this is not functional dependency preserving? Also could you work out the BCNF for this?
V1
Decompose the relations, as necessary, into collections of relations that are in BCNF. R(A,B,C,D) with FD’s AB->C,C->D,and D->A. Could you show step by step procedure for this with detailed explaination?
Give all the keys of R if the functional dependencies on R in each of the following cases
I need the answer as soon as possible
I need just shorrt answ
Consider a relation schema R={A, B, C, D, E, G} and its functional dependency set F = {A → BCD,BC →DE,B → D,D → A). Compute B*and choose the answer. - (a) B*= AB (b) B*= ABC (c) B*= ABCD (d) B*= ABCDE (e) none of the above
Consider the following functional dependencies that hold on R(ABCDEF): AB-> CD, E -> C, B -> EF Is R in 3NF? Explain your answer in detail and decompose the relation, as necessary, into a collection of relations that are in 3NF. Make sure you first find all the key(s) of R so that you will be able to tell whether an attribute is prime.
Identify all the functional dependencies in the following relation with columns A, B, C, and D a.A→B b.A→C c.A→D d.B→A e.B→C f.B→D g.C→A h.C→B i.C→D j.D→A k.D→B l.D→C
Let A1, A2, and A3 be attributes in a relation R. If both of these functional dependencies hold: A1 → A2 and A2 → A3, then A1 → A3 holds, because of the_? rule.
The text states that you can argue that “the only reason for having relations is to store instances of functional dependencies.” Explain, in your own words, what this means