Flounder, a large manufacturing company, currently uses a large printing press in its operations and is considering two replacements:the PDX341 and PDW581. The PDX costs $504,000 and has annual maintenance costs of $10,400 for the first 5 years and $15,400for the next 10 years. After 15 years, the PDX will be scrapped (salvage value is zero). In contrast, the PDW can be acquired for$126,000 and requires maintenance of $30,800 a year for its 10-year life. The salvage value of the PDW is expected to be zero in 10years. Assuming that Flounder must replace its current printing press (it has stopped functioning), has a(n) 9-percent cost of capital,and all cash flows are after tax, which replacement press is the most appropriate? (Round answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 125.25.)Chain Replication Approach:NPV of PDX341NPV of PDW581We would prefer$$Equivalent Annual NPV Approach:Equivalent Annual NPV of PDX341We would preferEquivalent Annual NPV of PDW581$$

For -PDX341, the Present Value of the Cost = 504000 current cost + 10400 for the next five years…

Answered: ars, the PDX w W

Business

Finance

ars, the PDX w W

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter9: Capital Budgeting And Cash Flow Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Dauten is offered a replacement machine which has a cost of 8,000, an estimated useful life of 6 years, and an estimated salvage value of 800. The replacement machine is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation at the time of purchase- The replacement machine would permit an output expansion, so sales would rise by 1,000 per year; even so, the new machines much greater efficiency would cause operating expenses to decline by 1,500 per year The new machine would require that inventories be increased by 2,000, but accounts payable would simultaneously increase by 500. Dautens marginal federal-plus-state tax rate is 25%, and its WACC is 11%. Should it replace the old machine?
Although the Chen Company’s milling machine is old, it is still in relatively good working order and would last for another 10 years. It is inefficient compared to modern standards, though, and so the company is considering replacing it. The new milling machine, at a cost of $110,000 delivered and installed, would also last for 10 years and would produce after-tax cash flows (labor savings and depreciation tax savings) of $19,000 per year. It would have zero salvage value at the end of its life. The project cost of capital is 10%, and its marginal tax rate is 25%. Should Chen buy the new machine?
The Container Corporation of America is considering replacing an automatic painting machine purchased 9 years ago for $700,000. It has a market value today of $40,000. The unit costs $350,000 annually to operate and maintain. A new unit can be purchased for $800,000 and will have annual O&M costs of $120,000. If the old unit is retained, it will have no salvage value at the end of its remaining life of 10 years. The new unit, if purchased, will have a salvage value of $100,000 in 10 years. Using an EUAC measure and a MARR of 20% should the automatic painting machine be replaced if the old automatic painting machine is taken as a trade-in for its market value of $40,000? Solve, a. Use the cash flow approach (insider’s viewpoint approach). b. Use the opportunity cost approach (outsider’s view point approach).
A company is considering replacing an old machine. The trade-in value of the old machine is currently $30,000. The unit costs $250,000 annually to operate and maintain. A new unit can be purchased for $700,000 and will have annual O&M costs of $120,000. If the old unit is retained it will have no salvage value at the end of its remaining life of 10 years. The new unit, if purchased, will have a salvage value $50,000 in 10 years. Find a) the equivalent uniform annual cost (EUAC) for keeping the old machine, and b) the EUAC for replacing the old machine with the new machine. Should the old machine be replaced based on your calculations? The MARR is 10%. Use the cash flow approach (insider's viewpoint approach)
Riverbed, a large manufacturing company, currently uses a large printing press in its operations and is considering two replacements: the PDX341 and PDW581. The PDX costs $493,000 and has annual maintenance costs of $9,300 for the first 5 years and $14,300 for the next 10 years. After 15 years, the PDX will be scrapped (salvage value is zero). In contrast, the PDW can be acquired for $123,250 and requires maintenance of $28,600 a year for its 10-year life. The salvage value of the PDW is expected to be zero in 10 years. Assuming that Riverbed must replace its current printing press (it has stopped functioning), has a(n) 10-percent cost of capital, and all cash flows are after tax, which replacement press is the most appropriate? (Round answers to 2 decimal places, e.g. 125.25.) Chain Replication Approach: NPV of PDX341 $ NPV of PDW581 $ We would prefer Equivalent Annual NPV Approach: Equivalent Annual NPV of PDX341 $ Equivalent Annual NPV of PDW581 $ We would prefer
Denny Corporation is considering replacing a technologically obsolete machine with a new state-of-the-art numerically controlled machine. The new machine would cost $290,000 and have a tenericals controll nortunately, the new machine would have no salvage value. The new machine would cost $48,000 per year to operate and maintain but would save $89,000 per year in labor and other costs. The old machine can be sold now for scrap for $29,000. The simple rate of return on the new machine is closest to (Ignore income taxes.):
A manufacturer is considering the replacement of one of its boring machines with a newer and more efficient one. The relevant details for both defender and challenger are as follows:Defender: The current book value of the old boring machine is $50,000, and it has a remaining useful life of five years. The salvage value expected from scrapping the old machine at the end of five years is zero, but the company can sell the machine now to another firm in the industry for $10,000.Challenger: The new boring machine can be purchased at a price of $150,000 and has an estimated useful life of seven years. It has an estimated salvage value of $50,000 and is expected to realize economic savings on electric power usage, labor, and repair costs and to reduce the number of reworks. In total, annual savings of $80,000 will be realized if the new machine is installed.The firm uses an MARR of 12%. Using the opportunity-cost approach, address the following questions:(a) What is the initial cash outlay…
A manufacturer is considering the replacement of one of its boring machines with a newer and more efficient one. The relevant details for both defender and challenger are as follows:• Defender: The current book value of the old boring machine is $50,000, and it has a remaining useful life of five years. The salvage value expected from scrapping the old machine at the end of five years is zero, but the company can sell the machine now to another firm in the industry for $10,000.• Challenger: The new boring machine can be purchased at a price of $150,000 and has an estimated useful life of seven years. It has an estimated salvage value of $50,000 and is expected to realize economic savings on electric power usage, labor, and repair costs and to reduce the amount of reworks. In total, annual savings of $80,000 will be realized if the new machine is installed.The firm uses an MARR of 12%. Using the opportunity-cost approach, address the following questions:(a) What is the initial cash…
Denny Corporation is considering replacing a technologically obsolete machine with a new state-of-the-art numerically controlled machine. The new machine would cost $180,000 and would have a twelve-year useful life. Unfortunately, the new machine would have no salvage value. The new machine would cost $26, 000 per year to operate and maintain, but would save $58,000 per year in labor and other costs. The old machine can be sold now for scrap for $18,000. The simple rate of return on the new machine is closest to (Ignore income taxes.):
Kendra Company is considering replacing an old machine. The old machine was purchased for $100,700 and has a book value of $40,700 and should last four more years with no salvage value. The company believes that it could currently sell the old machine for $20,700. The new machine cost $80,700 and will have a 4-year life and a $10,700 salvage value. Currently, it costs $20,700 annually to operate the old machine. The new machine is more efficient and should reduce operating cost by 50%. Based on quantitative analysis, should Kendra Company replace the old machine?
The Sumitomo Chemical Corporation is considering replacing a 5-year-old machine that originally cost $50,000 and can be sold for $60,000. This machine is totally depreciated. The replacement machine would cost $125,000 and have a 5-year expected life over which it would be depreciated down using the straight-line method and have no salvage value at the end of five years. The new machine would produce savings before depreciation and taxes of $45,000 per year. Assuming a 34 percent marginal tax rate and a required return of 10%, calculate The internal rate of return and the net present value. Please show work in Excel.
Xinhong Company is considering replacing one of its manufacturing machines. The machine has a book value of $45,000 and a remaining useful life of five years, at which time its salvage value will be zero. It has a current market value of $52,000. Variable manufacturing costs are $36,000 per year for this machine. Information on two alternative replacement machines follows. Should Xinhong keep or replace its manufacturing machine? If the machine should be replaced, which alternative new machine should Xinhong purchase?