Are there any other considerations that developers need to make?

When adopting object-oriented design, everything is framed in terms of objects. How can a large (or complex) thing be divided up into its parts?

The issue: Some programmers are so devoted to their approach that they won't consider the possibility that there is a more effective technique. Many people believe that object-oriented programming is the only approach, and that if everyone adopted it, all computing issues would be resolved. I've been a hacker for a very long time, and I've seen many trends come and go, including expert programming, artificial intelligence, extreme programming, structured design, and many others. They all vowed to solve the world's computing issues. They all never did, ever.One time, an opponent of object orientation put forth a dare. There isn't a single application that can't be improved with the use of objects, he claimed. The difficulty is locating such a software.

Are there any other factors that developers should keep in mind?