Anderson bought a sound system on display at Burton’s Appliance Store for installation at her dental office. The system was tagged “sold” with Anderson’s 3 name on it, and Anderson signed a form identifying the purchase and stating its price. On her way back to the office, Anderson saw another model in the window of Modern Electronics Ltd. and decided that she would prefer it. She refuses to take the delivery of the sound system from Burton, and Burton sued her for the full price of the machine. Who has the title of the goods? Does Burston’s action prosper?
Anderson bought a sound system on display at Burton’s Appliance Store for installation at her dental office. The system was tagged “sold” with Anderson’s 3 name on it, and Anderson signed a form identifying the purchase and stating its price. On her way back to the office, Anderson saw another model in the window of Modern Electronics Ltd. and decided that she would prefer it. She refuses to take the delivery of the sound system from Burton, and Burton sued her for the full price of the machine. Who has the title of the goods? Does Burston’s action prosper?
Related questions
Question
Anderson bought a sound system on display at Burton’s Appliance Store for installation at her dental office. The system was tagged “sold” with Anderson’s 3 name on it, and Anderson signed a form identifying the purchase and stating its price. On her way back to the office, Anderson saw another model in the window of Modern Electronics Ltd. and decided that she would prefer it. She refuses to take the delivery of the sound system from Burton, and Burton sued her for the full price of the machine.
Who has the title of the goods? Does Burston’s action prosper?
AI-Generated Solution
AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.
Unlock instant AI solutions
Tap the button
to generate a solution