An auditor desired to test credit approval on 10,000 sales invoices processed during the year. The auditor designed a statistical sample that would provide 1 percent risk of assessing control risk too low for the assertion that not more than percent of the sales invoices lacked approval. The auditor estimated from previous experience that about 2 percent of the sales invoices lacked approval. A sample of 200 Invoices was examined, and 7 of them were lacking approval. The auditor then determined the computed upper deviation rate to be(8 percent. In the evaluation of this sample, the auditor decided to increase the level of the preliminary assessment of control risk because the: Multiple Choice O expected population deviation rate (7 percent) was more than the percentage of errors in the sample (3½ percent). expected population deviation rate (2½ percent) was less than the tolerable deviation rate (7 percent). tolerable deviation rate (7 percent) was less than the computed upper deviation rate (8 percent). computed upper deviation rate (8 percent) was more than the percentage of errors in the sample (3½ percent). 3.5

An auditor desired to test credit approval on 10,000 sales invoices processed during the year. The auditor designed a statistical sample that would provide 1 percent risk of assessing control risk too low for the assertion that not more than percent of the sales invoices lacked approval. The auditor estimated from previous experience that about 2 percent of the sales invoices lacked approval. A sample of 200 Invoices was examined, and 7 of them were lacking approval. The auditor then determined the computed upper deviation rate to be(8 percent. In the evaluation of this sample, the auditor decided to increase the level of the preliminary assessment of control risk because the: Multiple Choice O expected population deviation rate (7 percent) was more than the percentage of errors in the sample (3½ percent). expected population deviation rate (2½ percent) was less than the tolerable deviation rate (7 percent). tolerable deviation rate (7 percent) was less than the computed upper deviation rate (8 percent). computed upper deviation rate (8 percent) was more than the percentage of errors in the sample (3½ percent). 3.5

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)

11th Edition

ISBN:9781337619455

Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg

Publisher:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg

Chapter9: Auditing The Revenue Cycle.

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20CYBK

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The auditor conducted test of details of transaction and audit client's revenue using sampling. There are 100 sales transactions made by the company. Overall of the 100 transactions, according to auditor’s professional judgment, materiality is set at 5% or 5 transactions. The auditor took a sample of 20 transactions, and it turns out that of the 20 transactions examined, there were 2 misstatement found. Based on the results of the sampling inspection, the auditor concluded that there was 2 out of 20 means 10%, and judge this finding as material misstatement. When in fact, overall of the 100 transactions there were only that 2 transactions occurred irregularities or errors that accidentally that two were chosen on 20 random sampling. What we called the risk involved in this case example? Explain your answer specifically!
James Duffney, CPA, has randomly selected and audited a sample of 100 of Will-Mart’s accounts receivable. Will-Mart has 6,140 accounts receivable accounts with a total book value of $6,000,000. Duffney has determined that the account’s tolerable misstatement is $500,000. His sample results are as follows: Average audited value $962 Average book value 970 Required: Calculate the accounts receivable estimated audited value and projected misstatement using the: a. Mean-per-unit method. b. Ratio method. c. Difference method.
An audit firm is conducting the audit of Diaz Construction Company for the fiscal year ended October 31. Rebecca Smith, the partner in charge of the audit, decides that MUS is the appropriate sampling technique to use in order to audit Diaz’s inventory account. The balance in the inventory at October 31 was $4,250,000. Rebecca has established the following: risk of incorrect acceptance = 5% (i.e., the desired confidence level of 95%), tolerable misstatement = $212,500, and expected misstatement = $63,750. Calculate the sample size and sampling interval using Table 8-5 in the textbook (round your interval answer to the nearest whole number).
A CPA company is conducting the audit of Finch Hardware Company for the year ended December 31. The senior-in-charge of the audit plans to use MUS to audit Finch’s inventory account. The balance at December 31 was $9,000,000, tolerable misstatement is $360,000, expected misstatement is $90,000, and the risk of incorrect acceptance is 5%. Compute the required MUS sample size and sampling interval using Table 8-5 in the textbook (round your interval answer to the nearest whole number).
The auditors of Landi Corporation wish to use a structured approach to nonstatistical sampling to evaluate the reasonableness of the accounts receivable. Landi has 15,000 receivable accounts with a total book value of $2,500,000. The auditors have assessed the combined level of inherent and control risk at a moderate level and believe that their other substantive procedures are so limited as to require a “maximum” risk assessment. After considering the overall audit plan, the auditors believe that the test’s tolerable misstatement is $57,500. Use figure below to determine the reliability factor. Please calculate the sample size. Risk That Other Substantive Procedures Will Fail to Detect a Material Misstatement Combined Assessment of Inherent and Control Risk Maximum Moderate Low Maximum 3.0 2.3 1.9 Slightly below Maximum 2.7 2.0 1.6 Moderate 2.3 1.6 1.2 Low 1.9 1.2 1.0
The 4,000 accounts receivable of GHI Company have a total book value of $60,000. Bob Smith, Certified Public Accountant (CPA), has selected and audited a sample of 100 accounts with a total book value of $1,600. Using the mean-per-unit estimation technique, Smith has properly estimated a projected misstatement of a $8,000 overstatement for the entire population. The audited value of Smith's sample is: Multiple Choice $1,600 $1,800 $1,300 $1,400
Carson Allister is performing a PPS application in the audit of Bird Company’s accounts receivable. Based on the acceptable level of the risk of incorrect acceptance of 5 percent and a tolerable misstatement of $120,000, Allister has calculated a sample size of 75 items and a sampling interval of $25,000. After examining the sample items, the following misstatements were identified: (Use Exhibit F.A.2.) Item Recorded Balance Audited Value 1 $35,000 $28,000 2 10,000 8,000 3 6,000 3,000 Required: Calculate the upper limit on misstatements for Bird Company’s accounts receivable.
Upper Limit on Misstatements Calculation: Monetary Unit Sampling. The auditorsmailed positive confirmations on 60 customers’ accounts receivable balances. The company’saccounts receivable balance comprised 2,356 customer accounts with a total recorded balanceof $19,600,000, and the sampling interval was $280,000. The auditors received four positiveconfirmation returns reporting exceptions. Upon follow-up, they found the following:∙ Account 2333. Recorded balance $8,345. The account was overstated by $1,669 becausethe client made an arithmetic mistake recording a credit memo. The company issued only86 credit memos during the year. The auditors examined all of them for the same arithmetic mistake and found no similar misstatements.∙ Account 363. Recorded balance $7,460. The account was overstated by $1,865 because thecompany sold merchandise to a customer with payment due in six months plus 15 percentinterest. The billing clerk made a mistake and recorded the sales price and the…
The 1,500 accounts receivable of DEF Company have a total book value of $30,000. Bob Smith, Certified Public Accountant (CPA), has selected and audited a sample of 50 accounts with a total book value of $1,050. Using the difference estimation technique, Smith has properly estimated a projected misstatement of an overstatement of $3,000 for the entire population. The total audited value of Smith's sample is: Multiple Choice $900 $1,150 $850 $950
In the audit of Checkers, Inc., a nonissuer, the auditor was assigned to a test of cash disbursements. The auditor randomly selected a sample of 75 items out of the 1,500 disbursements made. After completing the test procedures, the auditor determined that the sample contained several misstatements totaling $4,500. All of these were overstatements. The auditor then computed a projected misstatement of $90,000 $24,500 $337,500 $112,500 0000
An auditor is going to choose a sample of accounts receivable balances at year end to test and has determined the appropriate sampling interval to be 4 with a random start of the second balance in the list. Presented below are the first 10 accounts in the list (in order). Determine the first 2 account balances (including the random start) that will be sampled and tested using the sampling interval. Beads Galore $678 Beads N Such $5,125 Island Time Beads $235 Premier Beads $4,020 Regal Beads $567 Seattle Bead Xchange $321 Shipwreck Beads $3,502 The Bead Place $870 The Bead Place Too $450 The Bead Place Too Phoenix $125
Assume that your audit assistants also performed tests of controls on a sample of 200 purchases. During the tests they found that 16 purchases did not comply with the control procedures as laid down. This gave a sample deviation rate of 8%. After performing the tests, the audit assistant noted the following conclusion: The deviation rate of 8% is below the quantitative materiality level of 10% as outlined in the accounting standards. Therefore, controls over purchases can be relied on'. Critically evaluate the appropriateness of the assistant's evaluation of sampling results relating to the tests of controls on purchases.