An audit client is being sued for $500,000 for discriminatory hiring practices. Indicate the appropriate action the auditor should take for each of the following independent responses to the letter of audit inquiry: The lawyer stated that there is only a remote chance that the client will lose. The client did not accrue any contingent loss or disclose this situation.

An audit client is being sued for $500,000 for discriminatory hiring practices. Indicate the appropriate action the auditor should take for each of the following independent responses to the letter of audit inquiry: The lawyer stated that there is only a remote chance that the client will lose. The client did not accrue any contingent loss or disclose this situation.

Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course List)

11th Edition

ISBN:9781337619455

Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg

Publisher:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. Rittenberg

Chapter14: Completing A Quality Audit

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7RQSC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

An audit client is being sued for $500,000 for discriminatory hiring practices. Indicate the appropriate action the auditor should take for each of the following independent responses to the letter of audit inquiry: d. The lawyer stated that the client will probably lose between $250,000 and $500,000, but most likely will lose $400,000. The client accrued a $250,000 contingent loss and disclosed the situation.
An audit client is being sued for $500,000 for discriminatory hiring practices. Indicate the appropriate action the auditor should take for each of the following independent responses to the letter of audit inquiry: c. The lawyer stated that there is a reasonable possibility that the client will lose. The client disclosed this situation, but did not accrue a loss.
The following relates to the Menendez–Halliburton situation described in the text.(a) How would you characterize Halliburton’s accounting for revenue from ethical and professional perspectives?(b) Once KPMG learned that Menendez had provided a complaint to Halliburton’s audit committee highlighting questionable accounting and auditing practices, the KPMG audit partner instructed the audit team members to avoid communications with Menendez. How would you characterize those actions ethically and professionally?
Jones, CPA, is planning the audit of Rhonda’s Company. Rhonda verbally asserts to Jones that all expenses for the year have been recorded in the accounts. Rhonda’s representation in this regarda. Is sufficient evidence for Jones to conclude that the completeness assertion is supported for expenses.b. Can enable Jones to minimize the work on the gathering of evidence to support Rhonda’s completeness assertion.c. Should be disregarded because it is not in writing.d. Is not considered a sufficient basis for Jones to conclude that all expenses have been recorded.
Each of the following situations involves a possible violation ofthe AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. For each situation, state the applicable section ofthe rules of conduct and whether it is a violation.a. Emrich, CPA, provides tax services, management advisory services, and bookkeepingservices and also conducts audits for the same nonpublic client. Because the firm issmall, the same person often provides all the services.b. Franz Marteens is a CPA, but not a partner, with 3 years of professional experiencewith Roberts and Batchelor, CPAs. He owns 25 shares of stock in an audit client ofthe firm, but he does not take part in the audit of the client, and the amount of stockis not material in relation to his total wealth.c. A nonaudit client requests assistance of M. Wilkenson, CPA, in the installationof a local area network. Wilkenson had no experience in this type of work andno knowledge of the client’s computer system, so he obtained assistance from acomputer consultant. The…
Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. If Apex Construction also sues Williams for negligence, what are the probable legal defenses Williams’s attorney would raise?…
Assume that after completion of all fieldwork on the audit of Andler Company, but prior to issuance of the audit report, the senior on the engagement informed the engagement partner that he just discovered that his wife has an immaterial investment in Andler Company stock. Which of the following is most accurate as to AICPA Code of Professional Conduct requirements? Multiple Choice The CPA firm must resign the engagement. No action is necessary since he was unaware of his wife’s investment while performing the audit. The CPA firm should evaluate the significance of the breach on the engagement team’s integrity, objectivity and professional skepticism and ability to issue an audit report and then take proper action. The senior’s performance on the audit should be reviewed by the engagement partner to determine that the work performance was acceptable.
Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. Will the negligence of Mark Williams, CPA, prevent him from recovering on a liability insurance policy covering the practice of…
Mark Williams, CPA, was engaged by Jackson Financial Development Company to audit the financial statements of Apex Construction Company, a small closely held corporation. Williams was told when he was engaged that Jackson Financial needed reliable financial statements that would be used to determine whether to purchase a substantial amount of Apex Construction’s convertible debentures at the price asked by the estate of one of Apex’s former directors. Williams performed his audit in a negligent manner. As a result of his negligence, he failed to discover substantial defalcations by Carl Brown, the Apex controller. Jackson Financial purchased the debentures, but it would not have done so if the defalcations had been discovered. After discovery of the fraud, Jackson Financial promptly sold them for the highest price offered in the market at a $70,000 loss. What liability does Williams have to Jackson Financial? Explain
Analyze each of the following situations below and provide your assessment of the potential resolution of each scenario, including potential liability for the auditor or audit firm involved. Yasmeen CPA is a defendant in a lawsuit alleging that she should be held liable for gross negligence for a fraud involving the valuation of securities included in the financial statements of one of his clients. Yasmeen was uncertain how to establish a correct valuation for the securities and decided to rely on the price estimation supplied by management. A lawsuit has been filed against Elena CPA, charging here with constructive fraud in the audit of Broughton Company’s financial statements. Elena has examined all the audit documentation in his files and reviewed all relevant auditing standards. She is convinced that his audit fully complies with standards of the profession but is uncertain what he should use as his primary defense tactic. Canon Film filed for a bankruptcy in January 2012. A…
Julia is in the process of auditing the legal liability section of the financial statements. The controller indicated that he did not want her to contact their external lawyers and he is refusing to grant her access to the detail of the legal expense for the year and any legal invoices. What should Julia do in this situation? Indicate the steps, in the proper order, that should be taken.
A number of cases have considered the auditor’s liability in relation to persons other than the immediate client. Even so, the AWA case established that: Select one: a. Duty of care and skill means following the accounting standards b.auditors have a contractual duty to oversee and review the work of inexperienced audit staff c.Auditors are only liable for the proportion of damages attributable to their actions d.Auditors have a duty of care only to the shareholders.