According to the framework for ethical decision making, which of the following should the decision maker consider? Question 4 options: All possible alternative courses of action. The consequences associated with possible actions. Whether the rights framework would cause any course of action to be added. All of the above.

Which of the following statements about ethical choices and dilemmas are true, according to the text? MARK ALL THAT APPLY An ethical dilemma is defined as a situation where two or more "right" values are in conflict. Ethics can be defined in terms of individual and/or group principles, norms, and standards of conduct. Ethical choices can be considered highly personal and relative. All ethical choices are clear-cut enough that we can decide what to do rather easily because they pit "right" against "wrong." Ethical dilemmas represent conflicts in values.

Assume that you accept the following ethical rule: “Failure to tell the whole truth is wrong.” In the textbook illustration about Santos’s problem with Ellis’s instructions, (a) what would this rule require Santosto do and (b) why is an unalterable rule such as this classified as an element of imperative ethical theory?

What is the difference between 'Neutrality' and 'Prudence'? Please explain/provide an example for each.