Many problems, in diverse areas such as artificial intelligence and circuit design, can be modeled interms of propositional satisfiability.A compound proposition is satisfiable if there is an assignment of truth values to its variables thatmakes it true. For example, pnq is true when p = T and q = T; thus, p aq is satisfiable.When no such assignment exists, the compound proposition is unsatisfiable. a. Explain why if a compound proposition is unsatisfiable, then its negation is a tautology.b. Give an example of an unsatisfiable compound proposition with two variables, p and q.Justify your answer.

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/57ac8508-33be-4ed2-94ae-f7b2bc46ebe2.jpg

a. Explain why if a compound proposition is unsatisfiable, then its negation is a tautology. b. Give an example of an unsatisfiable compound proposition with two variables, p and q- Justify your answer.

a. Explain why if a compound proposition is unsatisfiable, then its negation is a tautology. b. Give an example of an unsatisfiable compound proposition with two variables, p and q- Justify your answer.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Q: " (A ∨ B)∧ ¬(A ⇒ B) is satisfiable. " model is correct ?

A: Satisfiable :- for any value of A and B if there is any condition which is true is satisfiable.

Q: Construct a box-proof of the following proposition. ((Av(BVC))VD)→(Bv(Cv(DvA))) Make sure that your…

A: Answer: We have done prove in step by step so we will see in more details.

Q: Construct a truth table for the proposition and determine whether it is a contingency, a tautology,…

A: Note: in Truth table for all Truth combinations of p,q is output value for proposition: (q ∨ p) ∧…

Q: 12. Choose the claim that is false, over arbitrary logical sentences a and ß. (a) The sentence a is…

A: Here is answer regarding the proportional model:

Q: construct the following proof using propositional and predicate logic 1. P & (Q ⊃ R) 2. (Q & ~P) ∨…

A: propositional logic Propositional logic is the rationale that arrangements with an assortment of…

Q: 2. For each of the following statements, push all negations (→) as far as possible so that no…

A: The given logic as :¬∃x¬∀y¬∀z(A(x,z) ∧ B(y,z))Taking the most negation to the right , so…

Q: ermine if each statement one sentence. (a) If the statement q is true, then, for any statement p,…

A: (A) If the statement q is true, then, for any statement p, the statement P=>Q is true. Answer:…

Q: Write a propositional formula y with variables p, q,r in the conjunctive normal form that has…

A: As you have posted multiple questions, we will solve the first question for you. From the given 3…

Q: 5: Truth tables are used to establish the validity of complex sentences. Show and explain how they…

A: Truth table is basically used to represent the propositional logic or to check statement assertion…

Q: Classify the following sentence as True or False: Reichenbach’s causation definition solves the…

A: Reichenbach's causation principle states that if two events are correlated then there is a casual…

Q: They speak English here. (The present passive for the this sentence is) English is speaked here. O…

A: Answer: Passive Verb : A verb is in the passive voice when the subject of the sentence is followed…

Q: Let Γ be a set of sentences of L1 (the language of propositional logic) and let φ be a sentence of…

A: Let Γ be a set of sentences of L1 and φ a sentence of L1. The argument with all sentences in Γ as…

Q: With illustrations explain the various connectives used in propositional logic. Translate the…

A: The question is to translate the given Propositional Logic to English sentences.

Q: Give the complete truth table of the following propositional form: ( ( p ∨ q ) → r ) ↔ ( ( p → q…

A: p q r p∨q (p∨q)→r p→q p→r (p→q)∨(p→r) ((p∨q) → r) ↔ (p→q)∨(p→r) F F F F T T T T T F F T F T T T…

Q: b) Using two different methods determine whether the propositions (p → q) → q and p V q are…

A: We have to check whether given two propositions are logically equivalent or not. We can check by…

Q: You are given the following sentences in propositional logic. Convert them to CNF and prove that "C…

A: Answer :

Q: Construct a truth table for each of the following compound propositions. a) p ⊕ (p ∧ q) b) (p ↔ q)…

A: p q p ⊕ (p ∧ q)…

Q: Identify the type of the given propositions.…

A: Prepositions are divided into three parts: Tautology, contingencies and contradiction. Whether a…

Q: Simplify the following propositions using equivalence laws (B ∨ A) ∨ ¬B ∧ ¬(C ∧ ¬B) ¬(C → B) ∧…

A: According to the information given:- We have to simplify the following propositions using…

Q: d) v d-) + bAd) v d-) (p v q, one of the followi either S, nor S, is IS

A: Solution - In the given question, we have to find whether S1 or S2 is a tautology or not.

Q: Suppose that we are using PDDL to describe facts and actions in a certain world called JUNGLE. In…

A: The Answer is start from step-2.

Q: Prove that r V (rp) is a tautology by applying the laws of propositional logic.

A: Answer: We need to prove the given expression if tautology. so we will see in the more details…

Q: please answer with proper explanation and step by step solution. Question: Provide proofs for the…

A: a. Proof for the full resolution inference rule: The full resolution inference rule is defined as:…

Q: Prove the following logical implication (A ⇒ B) ⇒ ((C ⇒ A) ⇒ (C ⇒ B)) without a truth table

A: Answer in next step

Q: Construct truth tables for the following sets of sentences demonstrating that they are…

A: Solution: Given, Construct truth tables for the following sets of sentences demonstrating that…

Q: Simplify the given proposition using Logical Equivalence rules and determine if it is a tautology,…

A: In logic and mathematical reasoning, it is often necessary to simplify complex propositions using…

Q: Let p and q be two propositions. Consider the following two statements in prepositional logic.…

A: Here, two statements are given, S₁: (-p^(pv q)) → p S₂: q→(-p^ (pvq)) p and q are two propositions.…

Q: Prove the predicate logic statement is valid: (∀ x)(P(x)) ∧ (∀ x)(Q(x)) → P(a) ∧ Q(b)

A: Introduction Predicate Logic: In mathematics and computer science, predicate logic is a formal…

Q: Prove the following logical implication (A ⇒ B) ⇒ ((C ⇒ A) ⇒ (C ⇒ B)) without a truth table

A: The solution is given below:

Q: Use truth tables to prove the following distributive properties for propositional logic. (a) p ∧ (q…

A: Is p ∧ (q ∨ r) logically equivalent to (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)? p q r p∧q p∧r (p∧q)∨ (p∧r)…

Q: Consider the following language: X = {(A) | A is a propositional sentence that has at least 2…

A: What is decidableA language is termed "decidable" in the context of computability and formal…

Q: (~B ->~A) -> ((~B -> A) ->B)

A: Tautology is an assertion which is true in all possible combination. Contradiction is an assertion…

Q: Negate each of the following quantified statements. Rewrite your answer so that negations are…

A: Given : (a) (∀x ∈ D) ((P(x) ∧ ¬Q(x)) → (R(x) ∨ S(x)))(b) (∃a ∈ X) (∀b ∈ X) (∀c ∈ X) (a > b +…

Q: Can someone solving this problems?

A: The question is asking to solve a series of problems related to the mathematical foundations of…

Question

Many problems, in diverse areas such as artificial intelligence and circuit design, can be modeled in
terms of propositional satisfiability.
A compound proposition is satisfiable if there is an assignment of truth values to its variables that
makes it true. For example, pnq is true when p = T and q = T; thus, p aq is satisfiable.
When no such assignment exists, the compound proposition is unsatisfiable.

a. Explain why if a compound proposition is unsatisfiable, then its negation is a tautology.
b. Give an example of an unsatisfiable compound proposition with two variables, p and q.
Justify your answer.

Expert Solution

This question has been solved!

Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Step 1

VIEW

Step 2

VIEW

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions

SHOW SOLUTIONS Which of the following sequences of logical equivalences is valid that would lead to your answer in logically equivalent to (p ∨ q) ∧ (￢p ∨ q) ∧ (q ∨ r). a.) Negation LawAbsorption LawIdentity LawDistributive Law c.) Absorption LawIdentity LawDistributive LawNegation Law b.) Absorption LawNegation LawDistributive LawIdentity Law d.) Distributive LawNegation LawIdentity LawAbsorption Law
Tell whether the nature of proposition is a Tautology, Contradiction or Contingency. Please create a truth table with test cases to support your answer. 1. [(A→B) ∧ (B→C)] ∧ (A ∧ ¬C)
. Give a semi-formal Natural Deduction proof of the following claim. You may only usethe eight Natural Deduction rules and no equivalence rules (such as De Morgan’s Laws).Claim. (R ∧S) →¬Q, R →S ⊢(R ∧P ) →¬(P ∧Q)
Consider the following syllogisms, written in the symbolic language of predicate logic. Which one(s) are formally valid? [Hint: Convert to a form suitable to using Carroll diagrams.] Jæ (Sx & Tx), Jæ(Tx & Rx) .. Jæ(Sx & Rx) Væ(Ax → ¬Bx),Væ(Bx → ¬C)... Væ(Ax → ¬Cx) Væ(Gx → ¬Hx), Jx(Hx & Ix).:. Væ(Gx → ¬Ix) Væ(Ax → Bx), Væ(Bx → Dæ) .'. Væ(Ax → Ex) O 3ar (Ma & Na), Væ(Ma → Ox) .:. Jæ(Nx & Ox)
1. Use propositional logic (direct or indirect proof) to prove the following theorems:a. ¬ (? ∨ ¬?) ∧ (? → ?) ⇒ (¬? ⋀ ?)b. ¬? ∧ ? ∧ (? → (? ∨ ?)) ⇒ ?c. (? → (? ∨ ?)) ∧ ¬? ⋀ ¬? ⇒ ¬? 2. Prove (a) and (c) from question 1 using truth tables.
Consider the following premises: 1. A (B A) is a Theorem of Propositional Calculus/Logic (i.e. it’s logically valid), for all statement forms A and B. 2. Suppose then that the following are the temporary axioms (assumptions): a) W (axiom 1) b) Y (axiom 2) c) Y Z (axiom 3) Using the logical rules of inference, Modus Ponens (MP) and/or Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), show that X Z is deducible (i.e. it is a logical/valid conclusion) from the given premises (i.e. 1 and 2).
I have this problem that I need help with; it needs to be done with predicate logic and a proof.
Express universal quantification in terms of existential quantification.
This question is from course Advanced Logic in graduate level. Please give the answer, if yoy know, in a clear and understandable way, as soon as you can.
1. Determine whether the proposition ¬(p → ¬q) → (pV (q → -p)) is satisfiable or not. Then state whether the kind of statement “the sentence p is satisfiable" is an existential statement or a universal statement.
Determine whether the following proposition is a tautology: (¬p∨¬(r⟶q))⟷(p⟶(¬q∧r)) can i get a non handwriting answer so it would be easy to copy please
Question 2 (a) Propositional Logic Let F be the formula (AV B) - (B V A), and let G be the formula A (B → (¬B V ¬A)) → ¬B. 2 () Provide a constructive Sequent Calculus proof of F. (ii) Provide a constructive Natural Deduction proof of G. (iii) Is G satisfiable? Justify your answer.