A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and P-value (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is your conclusion regarding Ho? OA. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a=0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving OB. Reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a=0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving OC. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a=0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving OD. Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a= 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. c) Draw a boxplot of the differenced data. Does this visual evidence support the results obtained in part b)? Choose the correct graph below. O A. + Difference or thir vecual Q Q roculte OB. ad in part hi? 5 Difference C Q Q O C. 5 Difference 02 OD. Difference

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and
P-value= (Round to three decimal places as needed.)
What is your conclusion regarding Ho?
OA. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a= 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving.
B. Reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a=0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving.
OC. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a= 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving.
OD. Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a= 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving.
c) Draw a boxplot of the differenced data. Does this visual evidence support the results obtained in part b)?
Choose the correct graph below.
OA.
-7
Difference
0 2
OB.
Does this visual evidence support the results obtained in part b)?
-7
Difference
0 2
O C.
+
Difference
0 2
O D.
Difference
0
2
Transcribed Image Text:A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and P-value= (Round to three decimal places as needed.) What is your conclusion regarding Ho? OA. Do not reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a= 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. B. Reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a=0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. OC. Reject Ho. There is sufficient evidence at the a= 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. OD. Do not reject Ho. There is not sufficient evidence at the a= 0.05 level of significance to conclude that the clarity of the lake is improving. c) Draw a boxplot of the differenced data. Does this visual evidence support the results obtained in part b)? Choose the correct graph below. OA. -7 Difference 0 2 OB. Does this visual evidence support the results obtained in part b)? -7 Difference 0 2 O C. + Difference 0 2 O D. Difference 0 2
A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and
measures the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c) below.
Observation
1
2
3
4
5
6
1/25 3/19 5/30 713 9/13 11/7
37.2 47.1 55.5 49.3 67.3 68.1
44.0 46.6 59.9 51.4 73.5 70.2
Date
Initial Depth, X₁
Depth Five Years Later, Y;
a) Why is it important to take the measurements on the same date?
▶
OA. Using the same dates makes it easier to remember to take samples.
OB. Using the same dates makes the second sample dependent on the first and reduces variability in water clarity attributable to date.
OC. Those are the same dates that all biologists use to take water clarity samples.
OD. Using the same dates maximizes the difference in water clarity.
b) Does the evidence suggest that the clarity of the lake is improving at the a= 0.05 level of significance? Note that the normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no
outliers.
Let d;=X₁-Y₁. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.
Ho
H₁
(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)
Determine the test statistic for this hypothesis test.
(Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Transcribed Image Text:A researcher studies water clarity at the same location in a lake on the same dates during the course of a year and repeats the measurements on the same dates 5 years later. The researcher immerses a weighted disk painted black and white and measures the depth (in inches) at which it is no longer visible. The collected data is given in the table below. Complete parts (a) through (c) below. Observation 1 2 3 4 5 6 1/25 3/19 5/30 713 9/13 11/7 37.2 47.1 55.5 49.3 67.3 68.1 44.0 46.6 59.9 51.4 73.5 70.2 Date Initial Depth, X₁ Depth Five Years Later, Y; a) Why is it important to take the measurements on the same date? ▶ OA. Using the same dates makes it easier to remember to take samples. OB. Using the same dates makes the second sample dependent on the first and reduces variability in water clarity attributable to date. OC. Those are the same dates that all biologists use to take water clarity samples. OD. Using the same dates maximizes the difference in water clarity. b) Does the evidence suggest that the clarity of the lake is improving at the a= 0.05 level of significance? Note that the normal probability plot and boxplot of the data indicate that the differences are approximately normally distributed with no outliers. Let d;=X₁-Y₁. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho H₁ (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) Determine the test statistic for this hypothesis test. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 13 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman