A fundamental trade-off in the design of any business system is between efficiency and flexibility: one can't have ultimate efficiency and infinite flexibility at the same time. The simplification and standardization required to improve the efficiency of an operation inevitably restrict the things the system can do. In addition, the short-term changes and decisions needed to make an operation more flexible inevitably disrupt the smooth and predictable process flow needed for optimal efficiency. In the readings, you have seen that different system design philosophies and tools tend to generate different balances between efficiency and flexibility, which, in theory, allows you to design a system with the optimal balance between the two. As you have learned, the optimal balance between efficiency and flexibility depends on the competitive environment an organization expects to face in the future. You have also learned in this course that the future is notoriously hard to predict, inevitably leading to many organizations having to run systems in competitive environments that they were not designed for. For this assignment, you will write a paper exploring the relationship between the system design tools discussed in this module and the business environments to which these tools are uniquely suited. Respond to the following: From business and academic literature, identify two current organizations operating in your area of interest—one organization facing a low-risk competitive environment and one facing a high-risk competitive environment. For each of these organizations, explain why you have evaluated its competitive environment as either low risk or high risk, using strategic planning and analysis concepts (such as Porter's Five Forces Model) that you have learned in other courses in your doctoral curriculum. For each of these organizations, recommend a pairing of a system design tool and a system operation tool that you believe will work especially well in the competitive environment faced by the organization. Be sure to explain why the tools you have chosen are uniquely suited to the competitive environment faced by that organization.

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question

A fundamental trade-off in the design of any business system is between efficiency and flexibility: one can't have ultimate efficiency and infinite flexibility at the same time. The simplification and standardization required to improve the efficiency of an operation inevitably restrict the things the system can do. In addition, the short-term changes and decisions needed to make an operation more flexible inevitably disrupt the smooth and predictable process flow needed for optimal efficiency.

In the readings, you have seen that different system design philosophies and tools tend to generate different balances between efficiency and flexibility, which, in theory, allows you to design a system with the optimal balance between the two. As you have learned, the optimal balance between efficiency and flexibility depends on the competitive environment an organization expects to face in the future. You have also learned in this course that the future is notoriously hard to predict, inevitably leading to many organizations having to run systems in competitive environments that they were not designed for.

For this assignment, you will write a paper exploring the relationship between the system design tools discussed in this module and the business environments to which these tools are uniquely suited.

Respond to the following:

  • From business and academic literature, identify two current organizations operating in your area of interest—one organization facing a low-risk competitive environment and one facing a high-risk competitive environment.
  • For each of these organizations, explain why you have evaluated its competitive environment as either low risk or high risk, using strategic planning and analysis concepts (such as Porter's Five Forces Model) that you have learned in other courses in your doctoral curriculum.
  • For each of these organizations, recommend a pairing of a system design tool and a system operation tool that you believe will work especially well in the competitive environment faced by the organization. Be sure to explain why the tools you have chosen are uniquely suited to the competitive environment faced by that organization.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.