Structural Analysis
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781337630931
Author: KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher: Cengage,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
A discharge of 0.15 cumecs is supplied into a canal at the head and 0.1 cumecs is delivered to field
having an area of 1.5 hac. The Irrigation is started at a moisture extraction level of 60% of the
available moisture and then extends for 10 hours. Determine the following efficiencies: water
conveyance, water application, water storage, and water distribution. The following information are
known: effective depth of r.z. = 1.7 m, runoff loss in the field = 425 m3
, water penetration depth
varies linearly from 1.7 m at the head end of the field to 1.1 m at the tail end, W.H.C. = 25cm/m
depth of soil.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 4 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, civil-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Please do it step by step correctly answer this is the second time post it .arrow_forwardWatershed area = 11.1 acres Average N concentration of inflow = 1.9 mg/L Total Rainfall = 44.75 inches Average N concentration of outflow = 1.4 mg/L Total pond inflow = 330,441 ft3 Average P concentration of inflow = 0.42 mg/L Total pond outflow = 288,492 ft3 Average P concentration of outflow = 0.23 mg/L Total pond volume = 46,893 ft3 (this is the volume to the top of the riser before overflow occurs) Answer the following questions: a) What percentage of the total rainflow flowed into the pond? b) If the pond were completely empty, how much rainfall in inches would be required to fill it to the total pond volume? Use your answer to question A to help answer this. c) What is the total Nitrogen load flowing into the pond in lbs/Acre/Year? d) How many lbs of Nitrogen did the pond remove over the year? e) What percentage of Phosphorous was removed by the pond?arrow_forwardQuestions (3.2) Determine using the 'rational formula' with runoff co-efficient equal to 0.80, the peak storm runoff to be carried out by the underground drainage pipeline AB for the drainage basin area of 0.2 ha as shown in the given figure. Take the length of pipeline as 100 m and the level difference between A and B as 0.5 m. Assume initially a pipe diameter of 250 mm. Consider Darcy- Weisbach friction factor f = 0.015. The rainfall duration and rainfall intensity is furnished in tabular form below. Consider time of entry at end A as 2 min. Drainage basin Duration (mins) 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 A Pipeline Rainfall intensity (mm/hr) 122 108 97 89 82 77 Check whether the pipe size is adequate or not.arrow_forward
- hope your help hydraulic thanksarrow_forwardPlease help.arrow_forwardExample Problem Water budget for a lake provides following observations: Precipitation, P = = 43 in./yr. Evaporation, E = 53 in./yr. Inflow to Lake, Qin = 1 in./yr. Outflow from Lake, Qout = 173 in./yr. Change in Lake storage, AS = -2 in./yr. Find the net groundwater flow. Solution: E SWIn GWin PPT Evap SW Out GWoutarrow_forward
- Hand written should be avoided.arrow_forwardSolve the problem using the NRCS method for a watershed located right outside New York City, New York for a 50 year storm event. Assume the soil hydrologic group B (65%), C (25%) and D (10%). Given Am-1.29 sm. Impervious = 6.6 acres, Woods =819 acres. Overland flow: L=100 ft, s=4%, fair; Shallow Concentrated Flow: unpaved L= 2300 ft, s=2.7%, stream flow L=9000 ft, s= 3.4% The Time of Concentration is 20¹ 12¹ n = 0.035arrow_forwardDetermine the water-application efficiency, the water-storage efficiency, and the water-distribution efficiency for the following conditions: stream of 80 lps delivered to the field for 5-hours, runoff averaged 40 lps for 2.5 hr, depth of root zone was 1.8 m, depth of penetration varied linearly from 1.8 m at one end to 0.6 m at the other end of the field. Ans. 76.5%, 66.7%, 90.6%arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Structural Analysis (10th Edition)Civil EngineeringISBN:9780134610672Author:Russell C. HibbelerPublisher:PEARSONPrinciples of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou...Civil EngineeringISBN:9781337705028Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam SivakuganPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Fundamentals of Structural AnalysisCivil EngineeringISBN:9780073398006Author:Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel LanningPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationTraffic and Highway EngineeringCivil EngineeringISBN:9781305156241Author:Garber, Nicholas J.Publisher:Cengage Learning
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9780134610672
Author:Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou...
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781337705028
Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9780073398006
Author:Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel Lanning
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781305156241
Author:Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:Cengage Learning