Structural Analysis
6th Edition
ISBN: 9781337630931
Author: KASSIMALI, Aslam.
Publisher: Cengage,
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Related questions
Concept explainers
Question
thumb_up100%
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · Nä Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ō'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tan d'
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ) q' tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm x 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors No Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps with 2 images
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Follow-up Question
I need detailed explanation to solve the exercise below. There are some formulas and hints, I also added some tables from the book.
Meyerhof's method, Coyle and Castello's method and Vesic's method were already solved.
Transcribed Image Text:A 20 m long concrete pile with a rectangular cross section of 460 mm × 460 mm fully embedded in sand is shown in
Figure P 12.2. Estimate the ultimate point load or tip resistance Qp by each of the following 4 methods and discuss.
Necessary variables and formulae:
Area of the pile tip
Effective vertical stress at the level of the pile tip
Atmospheric pressure 100 kN/m²
Ap
q'
Pa
o'o
Irr
Ir
A
Ms
Mean effective normal ground stress at the level of the pile point
Reduced rigidity index for the soil
Rigidity index for the soil
Average volumetric strain in the plastic zone below the pile point
Poisson's ratio of soil
1) Terzaghi's method (Use Ng
=
2) Meyerhof's method (Use Table 12.6 for interpolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = min (q', 0.5påtanp') · No Ap
3) Vesic's method (Use Table 12.8 for interpolation of N and modulus of elasticity of soil of Es = 600pa)
Sand: Qp = ¯'。No Ap
where ' =
0
exp[(37-4¹) tand
2
1-sin o'
1+2Ko
3
q', K. = 1 - sino', Irr
=
20 m
Ir
1+1,Δ
FIGURE P 12.2
9
Ir
=
For 25° ≤ ø' ≤ 45°, µs = 0.1 +0.3 (25¹), A = 0.005 (1 – $¹_25")
'-25°
q'
{
20°
20° Pa
Es
2(1+μ₂)q'tand'
4) Coyle and Castello's method (Use Figure 12.20 for extrapolation of Na)
Sand: Qp = q'N Ap
Concrete pile
460 mm X 460 mm
Loose sand
φί = 30°
y = 18.6 kN/m³
Dense sand
$'2 = 42°
y = 18.5 kN/m³
Transcribed Image Text:TABLE 12.6 Interpolated Values of Ng Based on
Meyerhof's Theory
25
26
27
28
29
Soil friction angle, ø' (deg)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
10
39
40
41
42
43
20
44
45
TABLE 12.8 Bearing Capacity Factors N. Based on the Theory of Expansion of Cavities
15.95
17.47
19.12
20.91
22.85
24.95
27.22
29.68
32.34
35.21
38.32
41.68
45.31
49.24
53.50
58.10
63.07
68.46
74.30
80.62
87.48
N₂
12.4
13.8
15.5
17.9
21.4
26.0
29.5
34.0
39.7
46.5
56.7
68.2
81.0
96.0
40
115.0
143.0
168.0
194.0
231.0
60
276.0
346.0
420.0
525.0
650.0
780.0
930.0
Embedment ratio, L/D
0
ITT
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
T
T
T
Bearing capacity factor, N*
9
20
40 60 80 100
$' = 30°
80
300
400
12.12
20.98
24.64
27.61
39.70
46.61
52.24
13.18
23.15
27.30
30.69
44.53
52.51
59.02
14.33
25.52
30.21
34.06
49.88
59.05
66.56
15.57
28.10
33.40
37.75
55.77
66.29
74.93
16.90
30.90
36.87
41.79
62.27
74.30
84.21
30
18.24
33.95
40.66
46.21
69.43
83.14
94.48
31
19.88
37.27
44.79
51.03
77.31
92.90
105.84
32
21.55
40.88
49.30
56.30
85.96
103.66
118.39
33
23.34
44.80
54.20
62.05
95.46
115.51
132.24
34
25.28
49.05
59.54
68.33
105.90
128.55
147.51
35
27.36
53.67
65.36
75.17
117.33
142.89
164.33
36
29.60
58.68
71.69
82.62
129.87
158.65
182.85
37
32.02
64.13
78.57
90.75
143.61
175.95
203.23
38
34.63
70.03
86.05
99.60
158.65
194.94
225.62
39
37.44
76.45
94.20
109.24
175.11
215.78
250.23
40
40.47
83.40
103.05
119.74
193.13
238.62
277.26
41
43.74
90.96
112.68
131.18
212.84
263.67
306.94
42
47.27
99.16
123.16
143.64
234.40
291.13
339.52
43
51.08
108.08
134.56
157.21
257.99
321.22
375.28
44
55.20
117.76
146.97
172.00
283.80
354.20
414.51
45
59.66
128.28
160.48
188.12
312.03
390.35
457.57
Based on data from "Design of Pile Foundations," by A. S. Vesic. Synthesis of Highway Practice by American Association of State Highway and Transportation, 1977
32° 36°
100
30.16
33.60
37.37
41.51
46.05
51.02
56.46
62.41
68.92
76.02
83.78
92.24
101.48
111.56
122.54
134.52
147.59
161.83
177.36
194.31
212.79
34°
FIGURE 12.20 Variation of N with L/D
(Based on Coyle and Castello, 1981)
38°
40°
200
200
500
57.06
64.62
73.04
82.40
92.80
104.33
117.11
131.24
146.87
164.12
183.16
204.14
227.26
252.71
280.71
311.50
345.34
382.53
423.39
468.28
517.58
Solution
by Bartleby Expert
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, civil-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Write a meaningful paragraph that includes the following terms:pores, water table, aquilude, aquifer, groundwater recharge, and infiltration.arrow_forwardThe picture shows a maglight, a cardboard square with a square hole in the middle, and a wall. Draw side - view and top - view diagrams showing how the light travels to the wall and a front - view diagram showing the pattern formed on the wall. Use words to help explain the pattern on the wall. Side View Wall Front View (wall) Square Wall Square Top Viewarrow_forwardQ1. Why are standards so important for members of the engineering design team? Q2. What is "Engineering Design"? Q3.What are the four standard types of projections? Q4. What is the correct technique for free hand sketching a circle or arc? (list three methods steps) Q5. If we are in the construction industry, Why we really need to know how to read drawing? Q6. Understanding what the different lines on a drawing represent is really one of the key factors in being able to interpret the information that these drawings of trying to convey. Please explain the meaning of Visible lines, Hidden lines, Center line, Dimension and extension lines. Q7. What exactly is Graphical communication quiz and online exam testing you? Q8. What exactly is a Graphical Communication project/assignment supposed to help you? Q9. What is the difference between proportion and scale? Q10. What tools are useful for drawing straight lines? What tools are used for drawing arcs and circles? Q11. What are three…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)Civil EngineeringISBN:9780134610672Author:Russell C. HibbelerPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou...Civil EngineeringISBN:9781337705028Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam SivakuganPublisher:Cengage Learning
Fundamentals of Structural AnalysisCivil EngineeringISBN:9780073398006Author:Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel LanningPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Traffic and Highway EngineeringCivil EngineeringISBN:9781305156241Author:Garber, Nicholas J.Publisher:Cengage Learning
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9780134610672
Author:Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou...
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781337705028
Author:Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9780073398006
Author:Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel Lanning
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:9781305156241
Author:Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:Cengage Learning