5. Now let's think about the bounds of variable p. Show that applying the boundary conditions on forces our quantum number (mi) to be equal to 0, ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4 ... What did applying the boundary condition do to our general solution from question 4? (Hint: to the apply the boundary condition, ask yourself: how is (p) related to (+2π)? Once you have the boundary condition, check the appendix for some potentially useful mathematical expressions) 6. Normalize (d). 7. Prove that a particle-on-a-ring will have discrete energy levels described by the following equation, Emi = m²ħ² 21
5. Now let's think about the bounds of variable p. Show that applying the boundary conditions on forces our quantum number (mi) to be equal to 0, ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4 ... What did applying the boundary condition do to our general solution from question 4? (Hint: to the apply the boundary condition, ask yourself: how is (p) related to (+2π)? Once you have the boundary condition, check the appendix for some potentially useful mathematical expressions) 6. Normalize (d). 7. Prove that a particle-on-a-ring will have discrete energy levels described by the following equation, Emi = m²ħ² 21
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 2 images