25. Main method(s) of biomass utilization are (Баллов: 2) biomethenization pyrolysis and gasification none of the above all the above 26. Which of the following is not a green-building certification * (Баллов: 2) Global Sustainability Assessment System Strategic Environmental Assessment Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method 27. Which of the following factors is NOT a key component in green building design * (Баллов: 2) location orientation fauna

25. Main method(s) of biomass utilization are (Баллов: 2) biomethenization pyrolysis and gasification none of the above all the above 26. Which of the following is not a green-building certification * (Баллов: 2) Global Sustainability Assessment System Strategic Environmental Assessment Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method 27. Which of the following factors is NOT a key component in green building design * (Баллов: 2) location orientation fauna

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5.3SD: Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
(e) Rooms from House of Quality are shown in Figure 1. Propose three improvements to the way how the customer requirements are addressed by the technical requirements. Customer Requirements CR1 CR2 CR3 CR4 CR5 CR6 CR7 CIR TR1 5 4 3 3 لا 2 4 TR2 1 O A O CIR - Customer Importance Rating O Strong relationship (9) TR3 TR4 O O TR5 A A CR - Customer Requirement Some relationship (3) TR6 Figure 1. House of Quality. TR7 O TR8 A TR-Technical Requirement A Weak relationship (1)
3. What is benchmarking?
2. Discover ambiguities or omissions in the following statement of requirements for part ofa ticket-issuing system:An automated ticket-issuing system sells rail tickets. Users select their destination andinput a credit card and a personal identification number. The rail ticket is issued and themcredit card account charged. When the user presses the start button, a menu display ofpotential destinations are activated, along with a message to the user to select a destination.Once a destination has been selected, users are requested to input their credit card. Itsvalidity is checked and the user is then requested to input a personal identifier. When thecredit transaction has been validated; the ticket is issued.
what are safety Issues of Perodua Company in Malaysia: 1.0 Safety Policy 1.1 Safety Issue 1 1.2 Safety Issue 2 1.3 Safety Issue 3
Can you try to make this into a level 1 dfd diagram
Q1. Identify and describe 6 elements of six sigma in relation to operations management Q2. Analyse the six sigma approachof DMAIC in relation supply chain management
Write the KKT necessary conditions for the following problems: (a) max r – a + rja s.t. x1 + x+ x3 = 5 5a – a3 – x3 2 2 X1, X2, X3 2 0 (b) min a+ x+5x1x2x3 s.t. xỉ - 3 + a 20 (c) min af + a + a3 s.t. 2.x1 +x2 1 x2 > 2 X3 >0
Please answer this question
Q: Provide a structured persona and related withdraw amount and check balance scenarios of an ATM for elder user having minor visual and reflexive impairments (problem in vision and movement of limb). Also suggest a low-fidelity paper-based working prototype of an ATM machine to support the mentioned withdraw amount and check balance scenarios. Note: this question is related from HCI subject kindly solved this corectly and in detail.