2. The table provided represents results on a survey given to U.S. adults on the issue of regional primary elections. The question asked was, "it has been proposed that four individual primaries be held in diferent weeks of June during presidential election years. Does this sound like a good idea or a bad idea? Good ides Peor idea No opinion Republican 200 200 Demoorat 250 176 Independent 27 21 At the 5% level of significance, do the data suggests that feelings of adults on the issue of regional primaries are dependent on political affiliation?

Whats the answer for each one

Suppose you work for a large cell phone distributor, and want to examine which brands of cell phones Canadians prefer around the country. Use the following example dataset regarding the number of users (in millions) based on phone preference and geographical location in Canada. Using this information, and assuming the sample represents the population of Canada perfectly, select all the statements below that are correct. |iPhone AndroidNeither 0.7 0.3 Ontario Quebec British Columbia Other 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.1 P(Ontarid Neither) -0.267 OP(Ontario)and P(British Columbia) are independent events. If a user was known to be from Quebec, the chance of them not using an iPhone is 50%. UP(Other) and P(Android) are not independent events. If a random Android user was selected, there is an approximately 23% chance that they are from British Columbia.

A local bank has three branch offices. The bank has a liberal sick leave policy, and the CEO was concerned with employees taking advantage of this policy. She thought that the tendency to take advantage depended on the branch at which the employee worked. To see if there were differences in the time employees took for sick leave, she asked each branch manager to sample employees randomly and record the number of days of sick leave taken during 2020. Ten employees were chosen, and the data are listed below. Do this data indicate a difference in branches? Use a level of significance of 0.05. Ho: H₂: Branch 1 Branch 2 Branch 3 Source Treatments Error Total Degrees of freedom: Rejection region: Test statistic: Decision: Conclusion: 15 11 18 df 2 7 9 20 15 19 SS 89.8333 50.6667 140.5000 19 11 23 MS 44.9167 7.2381 14 F 6.2056