2. Suppose that an agent is in a 3×3 maze environment like the one shown in Figure 4.19. The agent knows that its initial location is (1,1), that the goal is at (3,3), and that the four actions *Up*, *Down*, *Left*, *Right* have their usual effects unless blocked by a wall. The agent does *not* know where the internal walls are. In any given state, the agent perceives the set of legal actions; it can also tell whether the state is one it has visited before or is a new state.

2. Suppose that an agent is in a 3×3 maze environment like the one shown in Figure 4.19.

The agent knows that its initial location is (1,1), that the goal is at (3,3), and that the four

actions *Up*, *Down*, *Left*, *Right* have their usual effects unless blocked by a wall.

The agent does *not* know where the internal walls are. In any given state, the agent

perceives the set of legal actions; it can also tell whether the state is one it has visited

before or is a new state.

a. Explain how this online search problem can be viewed as an offline search in belief‐state space, where the initial belief state includes all possible environment configurations. How large is the initial belief state? How large is the space of belief states?

b. How many distinct percepts are possible in the initial state?

c. Describe the first few branches of a contingency plan for this problem. How large

(roughly) is the complete plan?

Notice that this contingency plan is a solution for *every possible environment* fitting

the given description. Therefore, interleaving of search and execution is not strictly

necessary even in unknown environments.